Abstract
There is a major information gap in Africa, where access to information is structurally disabled. This study was conducted taking the University of Dodoma in Tanzania as a case study. The causes for poor internet access were identified as: Lack of alignment between last-mile, middle-mile, and long-range network infrastructure; Tyranny of bad on-premises network design; Up to 15 network hops just to leave on-premises network architecture; Lack of best-practice templates and benchmarks for on-premises, middle-mile and national backbone network architecture in emerging and developing markets; and local operators charging exorbitant bandwidth prices. The US Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) definition of broadband is 25 Mbps per host. The World Bank defines broadband as 12 Mbps per hundred consumers. According to the United Nations, broadband is a basic human right and an absolute necessity for productivity and sustainable growth.
Key Words
Internet, Infrastructure, Africa, Bandwidth, University.
Introduction
While Microsoft has invested significant resources and capital in building an infrastructure to expand the access to the internet, the customer network remains a black box. Especially in developing markets, the customer network is contributing to more than fifty percent of the latency experienced by the customers in East Africa.
The problem is further exacerbated in the developing markets as cheap (low bandwidth) routing gear means that switches are layered over each other to mitigate the limited port count and port exhaustion while stripping capacity. Further, the investment is staggered over several years, meaning that the infrastructure is carrying over technology debt of low bandwidth gear, at times sitting upstream or downstream of higher bandwidth gear. This results in bottlenecks of congestions, further increasing the latency of the routers.
Figure 1
Cloud Assembly Line: From Client to Host
Figure 2
Latency Matrix for Africa
Microsoft’s Azure users in Africa enjoy access to applications hosted in Dublin, which gets routed through South Africa. As a case in point, for Tanzania the latency for measurement tests is much higher than average. While this is egregious in itself, the actual customer experience is almost in all cases twice the measured latency as the on-premises network on the customer side adds up to sixteen hops just to reach the access gateway. A TCP session windows scale limits are exceeded at this high level of measured latency, which causes the session to be either reset or terminated.
Figure 3
: Traffic arteries from Africa to Europe
Most
of the traffic to Africa is either coming to or from Europe. South Africa is
the largest internet hub in the region. Microsoft has points of presence (POPs)
in Cape Town and Johannesburg. This will change in the coming decades as we
will see more traffic flows from the Asia-Pacific region to Africa. India and
China have been embarking on massive infrastructure projects in Africa, and
enterprise business from India, China, Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore,
etc., is growing. As of now, all traffic from the Asia-Pacific region to East
Africa is routed through Suez Canal. In the future broader trans-Arabia and
trans-Africa paths can be opened to offer latency and resilience for all Asia
Pacific-Africa, North-South Africa, and East-West Africa traffic flows.
Table 1. Internet bandwidth (Mbps)
South Africa |
||||||
International Internet Bandwidth (Mbps) |
||||||
Country |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
United Kingdom |
24,332 |
44,572 |
32,077 |
127,703 |
159.615 |
258.860 |
France |
667 |
975 |
13,155 |
23,045 |
34,405 |
61.510 |
Germany |
2.114 |
7,304 |
7,769 |
12,969 |
30,626 |
40.937 |
Kenya |
155 |
155 |
11,465 |
12,242 |
22.203 |
25 571 |
Portugal |
1,244 |
1.360 |
155 |
9,933 |
12,613 |
15.000 |
Netherlands |
1,364 |
5,922 |
9,955 |
11,965 |
14,000 |
14.500 |
India |
1,244 |
1.552 |
3,110 |
3,744 |
13,722 |
11.800 |
Namibia |
1,010 |
1.399 |
889 |
5,017 |
6,381 |
7,123 |
Singapore |
- |
- |
300 |
1.455 |
2,506 |
2,610 |
Lesotho |
155 |
322 |
795 |
949 |
1,344 |
2.345 |
United Arab Emirates |
- |
- |
310 |
465 |
622 |
622 |
United States |
6.185 |
2,310 |
3,120 |
465 |
465 |
465 |
Nigeria |
- |
- |
- |
155 |
155 |
310 |
Ghana |
- |
- |
- |
- |
155 |
155 |
China |
4,041 |
- |
311 |
466 |
155 |
155 |
Belgium |
- |
155 |
155 |
- |
- |
- |
Australia |
— |
— |
1,563 |
1,563 |
— |
— |
National Indicators |
||||||
|
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
Int'l Internet Bandwidth (Mbps) |
45,476 |
71,337 |
163,704 |
255.025 |
385.571 |
546,415 |
Broadband Users (thous.) |
950 |
1,150 |
1,380 |
1,630 |
1.735 |
1,370 |
Broadband Penetration (%) |
7.1% |
8.0% |
9-5% |
11.4% |
11.6% |
12.2% |
Note:
All country data as of mid-year
UDOM Case Study
The
University of Dodoma is a sprawling campus on the hills of Dodoma, the emerging
capital city of Tanzania. The University has 27,000 students and 2,000 staff
members. The University consists of several colleges and research institutions,
ranging in focus from medicine and basic sciences to telecommunication and
information technologies. The University has been able to set up an impressive
brick-and-mortar infrastructure. However, the total bandwidth for 29,000
staff/students is 80 Mbps. Based
on initial download simulation models and laden by the topology round-trip
times, only 12 students can manage to download a research paper
simultaneously—and even then, there are considerable buffering and latency
delays.
Due to the poor conditions of the
network, a need was felt to map the network design. Though the mesh requirement
was a relatively simple 14 node network architecture, it was designed in a way
that the traffic would keep rebounding and hair pinning through the nodes,
requiring up to 14 hops to egress the UDOM campus into external networks.
The network design rendered any amount
of bandwidth availability ineffective for the user experience. So, unless there
were templates to design smart and efficient on-premises network architecture,
the network performance would have remained dismally bad. While the Microsoft
Windows Server literature is detailed and prescriptive regarding setting up the
network, there is little information on optimal network design best practices,
how to optimally peer with external networks, or laying out the network
gateways for best network performance and user experience. This means that the
most valuable components of the user experience are left to the local system
administrator, with little to no guidance about metrics or success criteria.
Figure 4
Issues with Network Design
In Figure 2, the network requires 9 hops to get from the fourth floor of the building to the adjoining building switch in best-case scenario, wherein the worst-case scenario, it can take up to 16 hops to reach the gateway. This is an issue of professional assistance in understanding network topologies, programmatic discovery of network topology and recommendation on optimal network design.
Figure 5
Network Topology for UDOM
Product Development of Network Design & Simulation Tool
Microsoft/Azure tool kit should be provided that can discover the network topology, the number of hops between different endpoints, and generate flow patterns between A-to-Z tuples. It should be built “as-is” on-premises network design, and then provide recommendation on optimal design based on running graph theory algorithms.
The Microsoft tool kit should be repurposed to work for optimization of Microsoft InterDC infrastructure and apply it to customer (on-premises) infrastructures, especially as depicted in the case study of UDOM infrastructure.
The layering of the router switches, port exhaustion and carrying over of technology debt can be resolved using graph theory/simulation analytics.
This approach can be generalized to any topology for small and large enterprises. In order to provide optimal customer experience of Microsoft services, there has to be optimization tools that can offer recommendation on the challenges involved while onboarding to the Microsoft Cloud.
Figure 6
Optimization to Star Schema for UDOM topology
Figure 6 is an algorithmically generated topology that improves information flow permanence by four to five times from all customer endpoints to access gateways.
Figure 7
Optimization to Ring Topology using Minimum Spanning Tree with pruning
In Figure 7, the algorithmic output applies Minimum Spanning Tree with pruning, and the programme self-discovers a ring topology which is ten to fifteen times more performant than any comparable topology. It would be several weeks if not months of work for world class architects to lay out such topologies applying iterative approach to network design.
The solution here can improve the bandwidth accessibility for tens of millions of consumers in Africa who are unable to receive broadband connectivity because of congestions and layering of on-premises network design.
The US Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) definition of broadband is 25 Mbps per host. The World Bank defines broadband as 12 Mbps per hundred consumers. According to the United Nations, broadband is a basic human right and an absolute necessity for productivity and sustainable growth.
10 G for 10,000
At the UDOM campus, the University’s Information Technology department, local government representatives, and officials from the Ministry of Communication and Foreign Ministry realize that they need to define a new mission for UDOM, which is just as applicable to the rest of Africa: “10 G(bps) for 10,000 (students).” Or simply, “10 G for 10,000.” Every educational institution should aspire to a minimum of 10 Gbps of Internet connectivity where the student population is 10,000 persons per campus or facility. For every additional facility or campus, the same relationship would be proportionally applicable.
There are over one thousand universities in Africa that fall into this category. The realization of this vision would provide 10 million researchers and academic users with 10 TeraBytes Per Second (Tbps) of additional network bandwidth for research and collaboration. Once the first phase of 10 G for 10,000 is rolled out, then the downstream impact on enterprise and e-governance can be quantified.
As Dodoma becomes Tanzania’s national capital and in accordance with UDOM’s status as a flagship research institution, a bandwidth of 100 Gbps for the campus would be appropriate. This would ensure that its future projected growth (a student population of 40,000) would have sufficient bandwidth connectivity. Moreover, it would also ensure that the University was able to provide high-speed internet to other government institutions in Dodoma, furthering e-governance. All e-government initiatives are dependent upon successful and reliable broadband Internet connectivity.
The University of Dodoma is poised to become a flagship institution in Africa. It will likely be viewed by the rest of the continent as a benchmark—a fully integrated student community with a global educational and research communication infrastructure.
However, infrastructure is a prerequisite for all future engagements and collaborations pertaining to technology and digital innovation. The modern infrastructure consists of three ubiquitous grids: a utility grid, a transportation grid, and a communication grid. The Tanzanian government has performed outstandingly well in constructing utility and transportation grids. The logistical arteries connect through air/rail/road travel. Even remote villages have electricity. Yet the country has struggled to develop a communication grid.
While cellular coverage in Tanzania does allow for basic communication, it is woefully inadequate to support education/research institutions, commercial enterprises, and e-government initiatives. This imposes a major digital constraint on the potential of the University of Dodoma. Yet this constraint is artificial. It can be easily eliminated by end-to-end network design and the removal of unnecessary hops for topology optimization.
Examples of Connectivity’s Impact on Productivity
i. All
teachers, including medical doctors, spend weeks, or even months, preparing and
grading exams. In the US, most exams are offered through knowledge management
systems (Sakai being an open-source variant).
ii. Most
students do not have access to computer resources, so most research is
submitted without actual experiments or simulations.
iii. Sixty
percent of grocery (fresh produce) prices are due to logistics costs, in
comparison to two percent in the US, as the transportation network is not
hooked up to the communication grid. This causes under-utilized trucking
routes/incomplete truckload runs, which yield empty returns.
iv. Prices
for virtually every piece of merchandise/commodity in the market is susceptible
to volatile pricing, as demand and pricing information are not readily
available. This causes the breakdown of the rules of supply versus demand in
the local markets.
v. The
government does not have statistics on trade and the migrations of people, so
decisions regarding infrastructure capacity planning are carried out almost
randomly.
Even state-of-the-art computing labs
like the Microsoft Innovation Center (MIC) run on obsolete software. As
software is increasingly updated online, a prerequisite for fully
operationalizing MIC is a minimum of
100 Mbps (3 Mbps/computer). According to cloud-computing requirements, a
benchmark for minimum viable connectivity is 5 Mbps for each host.
MIC should organize and host
conferences, summits, and technology events on a weekly and monthly basis.
These events should begin by leveraging local capacity and by nurturing UDOM
resources. Initiate MIC internship programs and MIC fellowships offered to the
students of UDOM and the broader community. Showcase breakthroughs in design
and software development through MIC engagements.
Communication Infrastructure
Classification
Long-Distance
Infrastructure
i.
Two subsea
(SeemeWe4, and WACA2) and one terrestrial cable (Kenya to Tanzania) to connect
Tanzania to the rest of the world.
ii.
National ICT
Broadband Backbone (NICTBB) connects Dar Es Salaam to Dodoma.
Middle-mile
Infrastructure
i.
The network
interconnectivity and peering to international internet and other local
providers is through TTLC.
Last-mile
Infrastructure
i. Connectivity of the departments is through a fiber optic link.
The
Tanzanian government has invested in long-distance, middle-mile, and last-mile;
but now the primary need is to align and stitch together the three classes of
infrastructure. This requires redesigning the network and investing in network
research within the University of Dodoma.
Framing
Principles of Microsoft Innovation Center (MIC) - UDOM partnership
Table 2. Framing Principles for
Microsoft Innovation Center Partnership
Principle
|
Method
|
Resource
|
Re-engineering
of Network |
Network
Simulation & Optimization |
Microsoft
world-class architects and network designers |
Broadband
connectivity |
Ø Achieve
10G for 10000 Ø Remove
TTCL from the equation Ø Turn
UDOM into an e-government internet service provider (ISP) |
Team
of UDOM researchers, leveraging ICTs and CIVE research arms |
Create
an organic model for MIC growth (after 10 G connectivity) |
Start
with concrete innovation initiatives with UDOM students |
Ø MIC
as a Consulting center Ø MIC
as a Data Hub for East Africa Ø Fellowship
of Windows Insiders Ø Startup
combinator and innovation incubator |
Research
Collaboration (after 10 G connectivity) |
Solution-based
and problem-oriented prototyping |
Ø Microsoft
Research Teams with UDOM faculty |
30 day-60 day-90-day milestones and six
months-1 year-5 years plan
30 day
Within
30 days, have a dedicated 60 Mbps VLAN connection to MIC from 5 pm to midnight.
Based on a peak to trough ratio estimations, this would improve the average
utilization for the University links.
Sixty days
Currently,
it takes approximately 30 hops for traffic to exit the University campus, with
10-12 hops are spent in leaving the campus. This is because of a multi-layered
network design, where switches are buried in unnecessary hierarchies of
routers. This calls for the need to prototype a redesigned network topology,
complete with simulations and optimization.
90 day
Budgetary
approval and assessment realigning the middle-mile and last-mile.
Six months
Full
redesign of the intra-campus network with new endpoints and gateways to
external networks. Operationalizing of the UDOM internet exchange point (IXP).
1 year
Have 10
Gbps connectivity at UDOM and realize the vision of becoming an ISP.
5 years
Have
UDOM connected to a Global educational and research network (NREN).
Digital
Divide and Context
While
developing markets are spending billions of dollars in marque academic campuses
in Africa, LATAM, and Asia, the primary challenge is to create a world-class
electricity and transportation grid with little resources. Funding needs to be
allocated to a fiber-optic grid to enable high-speed broadband connectivity.
Even where a national backbone of fiber-optic connectivity exists, the vagaries
of network design affect the end-users in ways that make connectivity painfully
slow. This has a significant impact on the ability of users to access global
content. It is instructive that how lack of connectivity can impact our
consciousness as global citizens. For example, the number of academics that do
not know of TED Talk is an indicator.
Product Feature Scenario Scope
There
exists price volatility, information asymmetries, and concentration of risk in
almost all segments of African commercial activity. From logistics, healthcare,
education and tourism, the lack of market dynamics leads to inefficiencies and
cost-heavy services.
The very idea of markets is not a
western economic construct. Rather the efficient flow of demand signal for new
services and ideas is tethered to risk diffusion, concentration factors, local
market forces (incumbent effects) and regulations.
Without
proper mechanisms to facilitate information flows; people have difficulty
handling complicated, abstract, low feedback problems. While technology and
western norms may not be applicable across the world – however the following
universal principles should not be overlooked:
•
Information mechanisms
•
Risk (diffused or concentrated)
•
Market dynamics
Economies of scale makes monopolies
natural – the question is how to turn the forces of monopoly into more dense
ecologies.
Everybody
benefits from more density. 10 G of bandwidth is being sold at 187,000 US
dollars in Africa while in the US it is sold at a hundred dollars. This is a
direct effect of market density. Toyama, K. (2010) equates technology to
a magnifier of human intent and capacity. This precludes technology as the
driving force either contributing or fixing the inequality in the society.
•
Digital is infrastructure
•
Internet is utility
•
10 G for 10,000
•
Internet2 for Africa
•
Markets are natural
•
Free Markets are super-natural
Conclusion
Azure Networking feature is an opportunity for Africa or for that matter in emerging markets worldwide to help them digitally transform and move to Microsoft Cloud faster. Piloted at University of Dodoma in Tanzania, East Africa, around the capability of Microsoft Cloud and how that can help them transform by leveraging Azure Cloud services.
1. The Microsoft has an opportunity to pilot a customer network optimization tool in Africa. The African Continent has systemic infrastructure challenges. Most customers experience poor performance when accessing Azure Services. However, the cause of the performance challenge is the on-premises topology and last-mile access. In most cases, service experience can be improved by multiple times by just fixing the on-premises, last-mile topology.
2. Azure Networking is uniquely positioned to build a simulation and optimization tool, where customers can visualize their network topology. Identify service performance based on the network topology on-premises, and the last mile network reaching the premises.
3. This work recommends optimal network topology that would improve the network topology by reduction in hops, layers, and loops in network topology leading to gateway with up to 200 times improvement in Azure service performance.
4. None of Microsoft cloud competitors have a viable feature in the space. It is expected that other companies would venture in this market.
5. Another addition of the Microsoft tool is a 1-year to 5-year total cost of ownership and cost of service models that can help in financial modeling of onboarding to the Microsoft Cloud.
6. The Microsoft tool can either be offered as a value-added service with additional revenue stream or it can be a free service embedded into Windows 10, Windows Server, and Azure Portal. This is a feature and capability that could differentiate Microsoft from its competitors, and more importantly help them remove this blocker.
7. The Microsoft tool can help with customers managing their network infrastructure, technology debt, and network technology roadmap with milestones such as when to upgrade, step function of upgrades, minimum network capability requirement based on load/ utilization variables.
8. The value of the Microsoft Cloud is that how users can leapfrog to the digital world given that they do not have massive legacy systems as much as the developed markets.
9. The Microsoft has built a product which either runs within Windows Server, Windows 10 eco-system or is part of Azure portal, which can do the following things:
a. Discover local network topology.
b. Identify bottlenecks and design constraints.
c. Recommend an optimal topology based on standard star-schema and Minimum Spanning Tree with pruning etc. approaches.
d. Microsoft should consider shipping its deprecated network gear or LinkedIn white labelled gear to some of the large research and academic institutions to Africa to jump start the local network infrastructure.
References
- Gomez, R. (2012). Users' Perceptions of the Impact of Public Access Computing in Colombia: Libraries, Telecenters and Cybercafés. Information Technologies & International Development, 8(3), 19-33
- Van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide. Sage Publishers. (Intro & Ch. 2). Deepening Divide intro,ch2.pdf
Cite this article
-
APA : Tehsin, M., & Mehdi, M. M. (2019). Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(III), 451 – 461. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).56
-
CHICAGO : Tehsin, Muhammad, and Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi. 2019. "Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III): 451 – 461 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).56
-
HARVARD : TEHSIN, M. & MEHDI, M. M. 2019. Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 451 – 461.
-
MHRA : Tehsin, Muhammad, and Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi. 2019. "Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 451 – 461
-
MLA : Tehsin, Muhammad, and Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi. "Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.III (2019): 451 – 461 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tehsin, Muhammad and Mehdi, Muhammad Muntazir (2019), "Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III), 451 – 461
-
TURABIAN : Tehsin, Muhammad, and Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi. "Internet Infrastructure in Africa: Status and Opportunities." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. III (2019): 451 – 461. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).56