<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">46</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Social Sciences Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gssr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2520-0348</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2616-793X</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">390584</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).11</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">1053</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Working Memory and Mathematical Performance: A Correlational Study</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Mumtaz</surname>
      <given-names>Naeema</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad Saeed</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Ayub</surname>
      <given-names>Saddaf</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>(Education), Department of Education, Hazara University, Mansehra</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">PhD Scholar</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education, The University of Haripur, Haripur</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>m KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education, The University of Haripur, Haripur</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Naeema Mumtaz, PhD Scholar (Education), Department of Education, Hazara University, Mansehra, KP, Pakistan.. Contact: 0</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>31</day>
  <month>12</month>
  <year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>12</month>
  <year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>16</day>
  <month>02</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>3</volume>
  <issue>4</issue>
  <season>Fall</season>
  <fpage>156</fpage>
  <lpage>172</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>16</day>
      <month>02</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/article/Working-Memory-and-Mathematical-Performance-A-Correlational-Study"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/4HMpiDfRC5.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/4HMpiDfRC5.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>This study is intended to examine the correlation between working memory of students and their academic performance in Mathematics. Specifically, it was aimed to determine the degree of relationship between working memory capacity and academic achievement of students in mathematics studying at secondary school. A sample of 800 students studying in grade 10 was randomly selected from forty government and private secondary schools (girls and boys) situated in Hazara division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Both Urdu and English mediums of instruction schools were included in the sample. The researcher used digits span backwards test (DSBT) to find out the working memory capacity of the students associated with their academic performance in mathematics. This study revealed that girls have outperformed boys very markedly in examination scores of mathematics at secondary level. Contrarily, boys have performed well in working memory capacity than girls at the secondary level. However a very small gender difference is observed in this study. It is also noticed that private secondary schools showed higher performance in examination scores of mathematics and in working memory capacity than government secondary schoolsl.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Working Memory</kwd>
  <kwd>Academic Achievement</kwd>
  <kwd>Relationship</kwd>
  <kwd>Mathematical Thinking</kwd>
  <kwd>Secondary Schools</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>3927</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>46</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-2">
<sec id="sec-1"><title>Introduction</title></sec><p>Mathematics has an active role to play in every area of human life so education of it cannot be ignored. Mathematics has an important place in the curriculum and it is a compulsory subject in almost all of over the world (Al-Enezi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148230">2008</xref>). Mathematics can be detached from the life of man as it provides a social base in fulfilling his needs.</p><p>All students in formal schools, study mathematics up to grade 10 in Pakistan. This is only a subject in which all students are forced to think to enable them to pursue their further education and to solve their daily life problems. It also provides a necessary base for other subjects. The study of mathematics is a requirement of all sciences, technological fields, engineering, bio-medical studies, and economics. All professionals also used mathematical work, for example, engineers, account officers, and the commercial world.</p><p>The mathematics related ideas are extremely abstract. Even simple calculations like subtraction and division are abstract while others are more abstract. Teaching of mathematics is used to sharpen the abstract thinking of the learners for the development of their learners&apos; minds. The mathematics gives a description of the universe in the form of measurement which is required to describe the position of space and time is proved by Einstein in the form of whole areas of quantum theory and chemical bonding mathematically. Learning of mathematics is considered difficult.</p><p>There are many research studies in which it is evident that individual to individual variation in working memory capacity are foretelling of cognitive abilities of persons when they perform different complex activities and function. (Fukuda, Vogel, Mayr, &amp; Awh, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148241">2010</xref>; Johnson, et al, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148243">2013</xref>).</p><p>First part of the memory is sensory where information is received. In this part of the memory perceptions are filtered (Johnstone, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148247">1997</xref>). Then this information passed through the senses and entered into short term memory because one can retain very little information in sensory memory (Gross, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148242">2005</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<fig id="fig-1"><alt-text>Figure 1: Memory Model</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 1: Memory Model</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageyIxbuZ0u.png"/></fig>
<p>There is a vital role of working memory in all sphere of learning processes. The working memory was once known as &apos;short-term memory&apos; and Miller (1956) proved ways that it can be measured.</p>
<fig id="fig-2"><alt-text>Figure 2: Short Term Memory</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 2: Short Term Memory</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imagetm2liPwJ.png"/></fig>
<fig id="fig-3"><alt-text>Figure 3: Learning Process</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 3: Learning Process</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageNwhsfY8e.png"/></fig>
<p>The working memory capacity is regarded as a psychological and physical space as information coming in mind for short time, where interaction of new information with long-term memory took place, and can be operated. In learning context, it is a space where the thinking and comprehension process in the mind of learner started to makes the sense of information to use in problem solving. The information processed in working memory has been brought to store in the long-term memory to leave space for new work (Johnstone, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148247">1997</xref>).</p><p>The academic achievement of the students related to socially developed objectives based on levels and capacity of learners in terms of knowledge, disposition and skills. At the time of writing the age and prior learning of the students are considered for their education. Johnstone and Selepeng (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148245">2001</xref>) stated that little understanding of language puts a load on inadequate working memory means and study of Durkin and Shire (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148240">1991</xref>) stated the particular difficulties language makes in mathematics with young kids and how this has direct relationship with the attainment. The capacity of working memory is spent to resolve language problems and disturbs the mathematical thinking (Johnstone &amp; Selepeng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148245">2001</xref>).</p><p>The overall relationship has been established between academic achievement in mathematics and the working memory of the students by many (Christou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148238">2001</xref>). Johnstone and El-Banna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148244">1989</xref>) described that student&apos;s low working memory is resulted their low performance.</p>
<fig id="fig-4"><alt-text>Figure 4: Thinking for Mathematics</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 4: Thinking for Mathematics</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageve0kiPnV.png"/></fig>
<p>In Pakistan, Ministry of Education is responsible for education. In Pakistan like many developing countries, the administrative structure of education is described with a &quot;pyramid model&quot;. The administrative set up for education at national, provincial, district and local levels is given as under:</p>
<fig id="fig-5"><alt-text>Figure 5: The Pyramid Model</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 5: The Pyramid Model</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageuqhFj2aw.png"/></fig>
<p>There are three types in the educational system in Pakistan: public educational institutes, private educational institutes and religious educational institutes (Madrassas).  They are given as under in figure 6:</p>
<fig id="fig-6"><alt-text>Figure 6: Three Streams in Pakistan</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 6: Three Streams in Pakistan</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imagezP2LCP0m.png"/></fig>
<p>There are three main streams which are quite different with each other in the form of curriculum, teaching strategies, fees, enrolment and ownership. The educational system in Pakistan can be summarized as in figure 6.</p><p>The Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE) conduct examination of Secondary School Certificate (SSC) students enrolled in government and private schools. A-level examinations are conducted by Cambridge or London university external examination at A or O levels and develop their own exams or assessment procedure for higher education.</p><p>The main purpose of this undergone research study was to investigate the relationship between working memory of the students and their academic achievement in mathematics.</p>
<sec id="sec-4">
<sec id="sec-3"><title>Objective of the Study</title></sec><p>The research objective was to determine the degree of relationship between working memory capacity of the students and academic achievement of students in mathematics studying at secondary school.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Research Methodology</title>
<p>Non experimental quantitative approach was used to determine the degree of relationship between working memory of the students and their academic achievement of students in terms of BISE results grade 9 in subject mathematics. The working memory capacity and the academic achievement of students in mathematics were two key variables of this study. The research instrument, data collection and analysis procedures were discussed in this sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7">
<sec id="sec-6"><title>Sample</title></sec><p>A sample of 800 students studying in grade 10 was randomly selected from forty government and private secondary schools (girls and boys). Both Urdu and English mediums of instruction schools were included in sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8">
  <title>Research Instrument Used</title>
<p>The researcher used digits span backwards test (DSBT) to find out the working memory capacity of the students associated with their in mathematical performance. The researcher started to read some digits in an order before the students and asked them to write the digits in backward order. For example, &apos;3 9 1 4 2&apos; would return as &apos;2 4 1 9 3&apos;. The reading speed for a digit per second is required for different levels. When students finish one level they were asked a new number having more digits in number and so on. For each number, there were two tasks. After making mistakes by the student for a particular level is considered as working memory has gotten its capacity.</p><p>To make the students familiar before DSBT, a digits span test is used just to measure recall capacity. The DSBT has been used for many years requiring extreme care. The time of reading per second the digits must be noted so that students should not be able to cheat by backwards writing numbers.</p><p>The researcher used technique of Danili (2001) originally developed by Johnstone. The sample was distributed in three groups. The groups were defined as follows: above average (working memory ≥ 7), average (working memory = 6), and below average (working memory ≤ 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-10">
<sec id="sec-9"><title>Table 1. Working Memory Test Scores</title></sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-11">
<table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>indicated that 288 (36%) students have (WMC≤ 5) (below average), 272 (34%) students have working memory capacity (WMC=5) (average) and 240 (30%) students (WMC≥ 7) (above average).</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td><p><bold>N=800</bold></p></td><td colspan="6"><p><bold>Working Memory Capacity</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">WMC Test Scores</td><td colspan="2" rowspan="2"><p>5 or Less</p><p>Below Average</p></td><td colspan="2">6</td><td colspan="2">7 or More</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Average</td><td colspan="2">Above Average</td></tr><tr><td>Number of Students (%)</td><td><p>N= 288</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>N= 272</p></td><td><p>34%</p></td><td><p>N= 240</p></td><td><p>30%</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-13">
<sec id="sec-12"><title>Reliability and Validity of the Test</title></sec><p>The reliability and validity (consistency 92%) of DSBT was established by El-Banna (1987, page 62) to measure working memory. DSBT provides real results in the form of original ability of the students but less than one in space when the digits of the numbered are reversed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-15">
<sec id="sec-14"><title>Mathematics Achievement</title></sec><p>The mathematics achievement of the 800 grade 10 students were taken from BISE Abbottabad examination marks obtained in mathematics held in 2011 (when these students were in grade 9) for finding correlation between marks and working memory capacity of the students. The students secured marks out of 75 these marks are taken as academic achievement of student in mathematics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-16">
  <title>Table 2. Marks Distribution of Students</title>
<table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td><p><bold>N=800</bold></p></td><td colspan="6"><p><bold>Mathematics Scores        (BISE Exam 2011)</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Test Range</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>25</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>25-50</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>51-75</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Categories</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Low Achievers</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Average</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>High Achievers</p></td></tr><tr><td>Average Score Gained (%)</td><td><p>N= 40</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>N=329</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>N= 431</p></td><td><p>54%</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 2 reveal that 40 (5%) students secured 25 marks (low achievers), 329 (41%) students&apos; secured 25-50 marks (average achievers) and 431 (54%) students secured 51-75 marks (high achievers).</p>
<sec id="sec-18">
<sec id="sec-17"><title>Data Collection</title></sec><p>The researcher approached the school heads after getting permission to conduct study and one teacher from each school to facilitate in data collection. The researcher with the help of school teacher applied the DSBT and asked the participant grade 10 student to write the marks of mathematics obtained in BISE grade 9 examination. The marks written by the students were verified by school administration. The participants keenly took interest during test activity. The heads and teachers for giving full cooperation for all data collection process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-19">
  <title>Analysis and Interpretation of Data</title>
<p>The collected data were analyzed using frequency distribution and found having normal distribution because collect data were continuous. For calculation of the relationship between both continuous data normally suggested to use Pearson correlation. The researchers also used Pearson correlation to calculate the correlation among working memory and students&apos; achievement scores</p><p>A random sample of (N=800) secondary level students including girls (n=400) and boys (n=400) was acquired. Overall 800 students were selected from 40 secondary schools&apos; level. From each school 20 students were chosen. The sample was collected from both the private and Government schools. Respondents were students of only grade 10 of arts and sciences.</p>
</sec>
<fig id="fig-7"><alt-text>Figure 7: Correlation</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 7: Correlation</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageQWmbHYqR.png"/></fig>
<sec id="sec-21">
<sec id="sec-20"><title>Overall Data</title></sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-22">
  <title>Table 3. Descriptive Data</title>
<table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td><p><bold>N = 800</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>Min</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>Max</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>M</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>SD</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td>Examination</td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>75</p></td><td><p>52</p></td><td><p>15.4</p></td></tr><tr><td>Working Memory Capacity</td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>5.8</p></td><td><p>1.27</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>The examination marks in the subject of mathematics show a good spread.  Mean 52 with SD 15.4 for mathematics achievement scores and Mean 5.8 with SD 1.27 for working memory capacity.</p>
<fig id="fig-8"><alt-text>Figure 8:&apos;Ideal&apos; Examination Mark Distribution</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 8:&apos;Ideal&apos; Examination Mark Distribution</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imagefrkSO63v.png"/></fig>
<p>The analysis of the sub-groups is given descriptively in table 4.</p>
<sec id="sec-23">
  <title>Table 4. Descriptive Analysis for Type of School and Gender</title>
<table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3"> </td><td colspan="2"><p>Boys</p><p>Private Schools</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Girls</p><p>Private Schools</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Boys</p><p>Government Schools</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Girls</p><p>Government Schools</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>N = 200</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>N = 200</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>N = 200</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>N = 200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>M</p></td><td><p>SD</p></td><td><p>M</p></td><td><p>SD</p></td><td><p>M</p></td><td><p>SD</p></td><td><p>M</p></td><td><p>SD</p></td></tr><tr><td>Examination</td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>9.1</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>5.8</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>9.2</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>10.1</p></td></tr><tr><td>Working Memory Capacity</td><td><p>6.3</p></td><td><p>1.1</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td><td><p>1.1</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td><td><p>5.4</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 4 shows that mean examination scores in the subject of mathematics of boys&apos; private student is (M = 63) remarkedly higher than mean (M = 37) of boys&apos; government students. Similarly mean working memory capacity scores in the subject of mathematics of boys&apos; private student are (M = 6.3)   higher than mean (M = 5.5) of boys&apos; government students.</p><p>Likewise, table 4 also depict that mean examination scores in the subject of mathematics of girls&apos; private student is (M = 66) prominently higher than mean (M = 41) of girls&apos; government students. Similarly mean working memory capacity scores in the subject of mathematics of girls&apos; private student are (M = 6.1)   higher than mean (M = 5.4) of girls&apos; government students. It illustrates that private schools outperform in examination and in working memory capacity. It also appears that girls showed higher performance than boys in examinations in both type of schools.</p>
<sec id="sec-24">
  <title>Table 5. Mean Difference between Boys and Girls on Variable of Examination (N = 800)</title>
<table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><title>Table 5</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Variable</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Girls </bold></p><p><bold>(n = 400)</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Boys </bold></p><p><bold>(n=400)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>t </bold></italic><bold>(798)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>95% CI</bold></p></td><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Cohen&apos;s d</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><bold>LL</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>UL</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Examination</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>14.9</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>15.7</p></td><td><p>3.5</p></td><td><p>&lt;0.001</p></td><td><p>-1.20</p></td><td><p>1.80</p></td><td><p>0.26</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 5 shows statistically significant difference between girls and boys scores on examination.  Table 5 also revealed Mean value of girls (M = 54) is markedly greater than boys (M = 50). Cohen&apos;s d value also reveals the small effect size of gender on examination results.</p>
<sec id="sec-25">
  <title>Table 6. Mean Difference between Boys and Girls on Variable of Working Memory (N = 800)</title>
<table-wrap id="table6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><title>Table 6</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Variable</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Girls </bold></p><p><bold>(n = 400)</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Boys </bold></p><p><bold>(n=400)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>t </bold></italic><bold>(798)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>95% CI</bold></p></td><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Cohen&apos;s d</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><bold>LL</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>UL</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td>Working Memory</td><td><p>5.7</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td><td><p>5.9</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td><td><p>2.1</p></td><td><p>&lt;.05</p></td><td><p>-0.03</p></td><td><p>0.79</p></td><td><p>-0.15</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 6 shows statistically significant difference between girls and boys scores on working memory. Table also revealed Mean value of boys (M = 5.9) is slightly greater than girls (M = 5.7). Cohen&apos;s d value also reveals the small effect size of gender on working memory.</p>
<sec id="sec-26">
  <title>Table 7. Mean Difference between Government School Students and Private School Students on Variable of Examination and Working Memory (N = 800)</title>
<table-wrap id="table7"><label>Table 7</label><caption><title>Table 7</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Measures</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Government School </bold></p><p><bold>(n=400)</bold></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>Private </bold></p><p><bold>School (n=400)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>t </bold></italic><bold>(261)</bold></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><bold>95% CI</bold></p></td><td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Cohen&apos;s d</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>M</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><italic><bold>SD</bold></italic></p></td><td><p><bold>LL</bold></p></td><td><p><bold>UL</bold></p></td></tr><tr><td>Examination</td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>7.9</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>9.9</p></td><td><p>39.8</p></td><td><p>&lt;.001</p></td><td><p>2.13</p></td><td><p>3.88</p></td><td><p>2.91</p></td></tr><tr><td>Working Memory</td><td><p>5.5</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td><td><p>1.1</p></td><td><p>8.7</p></td><td><p>&lt;.01</p></td><td><p>-0.71</p></td><td><p>-0.47</p></td><td><p>-0.58</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 7 exhibited statistically significant difference between government school and private school on examination scores of the students on subject of Mathematics. Table also revealed Mean value of government school (M = 65) is distinctly greater than private school (M = 40). Cohen&apos;s d value also reveals the large effect size of sector on examination results. Table 7 depicts statistically significant difference between government school and private school on working memory of the students studying Mathematics at secondary level. Table also revealed Mean value of working memory of private school (M = 6.2) is slightly greater than government school  (M = 5.5). Cohen&apos;s d value also reveals the small effect size on working memory.</p>
<sec id="sec-28">
<sec id="sec-27"><title>Academic achievement</title></sec><p>The scores distribution is shown in figure 9.</p>
</sec>
<fig id="fig-9"><alt-text>Figure 9: Performance in Examinations (total sample)</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 9: Performance in Examinations (total sample)</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageUpaKTezW.png"/></fig>
<p>Figure 9 demonstrates a bimodal arrangement of a whole sample comprised of two samples. This histogram revealed Mean value is 52 and SD is 15.4.</p><p>The distribution of performance in examination is close enough to normal of use Pearson correlation (figure 10).</p>
<fig id="fig-10"><alt-text>Figure 10: Performance in Examinations (by School Type)</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 10: Performance in Examinations (by School Type)</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imagelkIBBO30.png"/></fig>
<p>The figure 10 illustrates the difference in performance between the two types of school (government and private). Curve showing Mean value of private school (M=65) is clearly greater than government school (M=40). Perhaps, the private sector schools are attracting much more able learners and this is reflected in their academic achievement in the form of BISE grade 9 results in mathematics.</p>
<sec id="sec-30">
<sec id="sec-29"><title>Working Memory</title></sec><p>The distribution of working memory capacity is given in following figure 11.</p>
</sec>
<fig id="fig-11"><alt-text>Figure 11 is showing almost perfect normal distribution. The mean score (M=5.8) for working memory c</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 11 is showing almost perfect normal distribution. The mean score (M=5.8) for working memory c</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageKQjMigiG.png"/></fig>
<p>The distributions for the both government and private schools show variations (Figure 12).</p>
<fig id="fig-12"><alt-text>Figure 12: Working Memory Capacity (by School Type)</alt-text><caption><title>Figure 12: Working Memory Capacity (by School Type)</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/4HMpiDfRC5/imageVN9dTHj4.png"/></fig>
<p>Figure 12 exposed mean value (M=6.2) for working memory of private school students which is slightly greater than mean value (M=5.5) of government school students, which shows marked difference between two types of school.</p>
<sec id="sec-31">
  <title>Table 9. The Effect of Working Memory of Students on their Academic Achievement</title>
<table-wrap id="table8"><label>Table 8</label><caption><title>Table 8</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td><p>N = 800</p></td><td colspan="3"><p>Working Memory Capacity</p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p>Above average</p><p>(N = 240)</p></td><td><p>Average</p><p>(N = 272)</p></td><td><p>Below average</p><p>(N = 288)</p></td></tr><tr><td>Average Marks Secured (%)</td><td><p>58.8</p></td><td><p>54.4</p></td><td><p>44.2</p></td></tr><tr><td>Correlation Ratio</td><td colspan="3"><p>r =0.43 (p &lt; 0.001)</p></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<p>Table 9 shows that there are three groups on the basis are working memory capacity above average (WMC ≥7, N=240), average (WMC =6, N=272) and below average (WMC ≤ 6, N=288) having average marks (%) gained 58.8%, 54.4% and 44.2%. respectively. This implies the difference of average mark gained (%) among number of students on the basis of working memory capacity given in above groups are not high (only 14.6% above average and average). The correlation ratio (r=0.43, p &lt; 0.001) between the working memory capacity and marks gained in mathematics is highly significant.</p>
<sec id="sec-33">
<sec id="sec-32"><title>Results and Discussion</title></sec><p>Although several studies always indicated that the relationship between working memory capacity and academic achievement is statistically significant. This type of relationship is for a very few studies. Johnstone and El-Banna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148244">1989</xref>) indicated as is cause-and-effect. Ali and Reid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148232">2012</xref>) stated &quot;working memory capacity can only correlate with performance if teaching and learning process is such that students with higher working memory capacities have an advantage and the assessment is such that students with higher working memory capacities have an advantage&quot;.</p><p>There is a significant difference between girls and boys scores on examination.  The Mean value of girls (M = 54) is markedly greater than boys (M = 50). It shows that girls performed better than boys in examinations in both government and private schools. Hence, results exposed clearly that girls performed better than boys. Ali and Reid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148232">2012</xref>) found normally no gender differences at the time of measuring working memory. Although, quite little differences in gender is found in this study.</p><p>Results revealed statistically significant difference between girls and boys scores on working memory. Table also revealed Mean value of boys (M = 5.9) is slightly greater than girls (M = 5.7). Mean value of private school (M = 65) is distinctly greater than government school (M = 40). The difference in academic achievement between the two types of schools was considerable.  Obviously, students of better ability are attracted by the private schools which is revealed in the examination performance.</p><p>There is a significant difference between government school and private school on working memory of the students studying Mathematics at secondary level. Table also revealed Mean value of working memory of private school (M = 6.2) is slightly greater than government school (M = 5.5). Chu and Reid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148239">2012</xref>) discovered correlation ratio (0.62) with 38% variation in working memory) wheras in Pakistan, Ali and Reid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref148232">2012</xref>) found correlation 0.69 in mathematics (48% variance)</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-35">
<sec id="sec-34"><title>Conclusion</title></sec><p>This study revealed that girls have outperformed boys very markedly in examination scores of mathematics at secondary level. The current study also found that girls may have had the potential to perform better than boys in mathematics this is may be caused by developmental reasons such as girls are very mature at this stage than boys. However, boys&apos; performance may have been attenuated as they rely mostly on recalling pervious knowledge low willingness to respond to assessment.</p><p>The Contrariwise, boys have performed well in working memory capacity than girls at the secondary level. There are normally no gender differences are found in literature. However the very small gender difference is observed here. It is also noticed that private secondary schools showed higher performance in examination scores of mathematics and in working memory capacity than government secondary schools level.</p><p><break/></p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/4HMpiDfRC5.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="AlAhmadi">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Al-Ahmadi, F., &amp; Reid, N</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <source>Scientific thinking: Can it be taught? Journal of Science Education</source>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>18</fpage>
    <lpage>24</lpage>
    Al-Ahmadi, F., &amp; Reid, N. (2012). Scientific thinking: Can it be taught? Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 18-24
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="AlEnezi">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Al-Enezi, D</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Difficulties associated with teaching and learning mathematics: A study of psychological factors affecting pupils’ performance (Unpublished doctoral thesis)</article-title>
    <source>University of Glasgow. United Kingdom</source>
    <page-range>sychological</page-range>
    Al-Enezi, D. (2008). Difficulties associated with teaching and learning mathematics: A study of psychological factors affecting pupils’ performance (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Glasgow. United Kingdom.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ali">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ali, A.A. &amp; Reid, N</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. Understanding mathematics some key factors</article-title>
    <source>European Journal of Educational Research</source>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>283</fpage>
    <lpage>299</lpage>
    Ali, A.A. &amp; Reid, N. (2012). Understanding mathematics some key factors. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 283-299.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Baddeley">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Baddeley, A. D</person-group>
    <year>1986</year>
    <source>A working memory, London, Oxford University Press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Baddeley, A. D. (1986). A working memory, London, Oxford University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Chandi">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Chandi, S. S</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Systems thinking as a teaching and learning tool for biology education, (PhD Thesis)</article-title>
    <source>Glasgow, University of Strathclyde</source>
    <page-range>hD</page-range>
    Chandi, S. S. (2008). Systems thinking as a teaching and learning tool for biology education, (PhD Thesis). Glasgow, University of Strathclyde.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Christou">
  <label>10</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Christou, K</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. Difficulties in solving algebra story problems with secondary pupils</article-title>
    <source>Science Education Centre. Glasgow, University of Glasgow</source>
    <page-range>roblems</page-range>
    Christou, K. (2001). Difficulties in solving algebra story problems with secondary pupils. Science Education Centre. Glasgow, University of Glasgow.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Chu">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Chu, Y-C and Reid, N</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. Genetics at school level: Addressing the difficulties</article-title>
    <source>Research in Science and Technological Education</source>
    <volume>31</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>25</lpage>
    Chu, Y-C and Reid, N. (2012). Genetics at school level: Addressing the difficulties. Research in Science and Technological Education, 31(1), 1-25.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Durkin">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Durkin, K., &amp; Shire, B</person-group>
    <year>1991</year>
    <article-title>. Language in mathematical education</article-title>
    <source>Buckingham, Open University Press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Durkin, K., &amp; Shire, B. (1991). Language in mathematical education. Buckingham, Open University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Fukuda">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Fukuda K, Vogel E, Mayr U, &amp; Awh E</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity</article-title>
    <source>Psychonomic Bulletin and Review</source>
    <page-range>sychonomic</page-range>
    Fukuda K, Vogel E, Mayr U, &amp; Awh E. (2010). Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 175:673–679.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Gross">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gross, R</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <source>Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour (5th ed.), London: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data</source>
    <page-range>sychology</page-range>
    Gross, R. (2005). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour (5th ed.), London: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Johnson">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnson, M. K., McMahon, R. P., Robinson, B. M., Harvey, A. N. Hahn, B., Leonard, C. J. Luck, S. J. &amp; Gold, J. M</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia</article-title>
    <source>Neuropsychology</source>
    <volume>27</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>220</fpage>
    Johnson, M. K., McMahon, R. P., Robinson, B. M., Harvey, A. N. Hahn, B., Leonard, C. J. Luck, S. J. &amp; Gold, J. M. (2013). The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology. 27(2), 220–229.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Johnstone">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnstone, A. H. &amp; El-Banna, H</person-group>
    <year>1989</year>
    <article-title>. Understanding learning difficulties: a predictive research model</article-title>
    <source>Studies in Higher Education</source>
    <volume>14</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>159</fpage>
    <lpage>68</lpage>
    Johnstone, A. H. &amp; El-Banna, H. (1989). Understanding learning difficulties: a predictive research model. Studies in Higher Education, 14(2), 159-68.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Reid">
  <label>23</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Reid, N</person-group>
    <year>2009a</year>
    <source>The concept of working memory, Research in Science and Technological Education</source>
    <volume>27</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>131</fpage>
    <lpage>138</lpage>
    Reid, N. (2009a). The concept of working memory, Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(2), 131-138.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148230">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Al-Enezi</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    Al-Enezi (2008).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148232">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ali and Reid</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    Ali and Reid (2012).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148238">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Christou</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    Christou (2001).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148239">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Chu and Reid</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    Chu and Reid (2012).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148240">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Durkin and Shire</person-group>
    <year>1991</year>
    Durkin and Shire (1991).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148241">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Awh</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    Awh (2010).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148242">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gross</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    Gross (2005).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148243">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">ref148243</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    ref148243 (2013).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148244">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnstone and El-Banna</person-group>
    <year>1989</year>
    Johnstone and El-Banna (1989).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148245">
  <label>10</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnstone and Selepeng</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    Johnstone and Selepeng (2001).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref148247">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnstone</person-group>
    <year>1997</year>
    Johnstone (1997).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>