<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">46</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Social Sciences Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gssr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2520-0348</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2616-793X</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">390716</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).43</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">1185</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">High School Students&apos; Perception of Challenges in Physics Learning and Relevance of Field Dependency</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Akhter</surname>
      <given-names>Nasrin</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Abdul Majeed</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Ud Din</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad Naseer</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education, University of Mianwali</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Institute of Education &amp; Research, Kohat University of Science &amp; Technology, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Nasrin Akhter, Assistant Professor,Department of Educational Research and Assessment,University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan.. Contact: 0</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>30</day>
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>16</day>
  <month>02</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>4</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <season>Spring</season>
  <fpage>336</fpage>
  <lpage>343</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>16</day>
      <month>02</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/article/High-School-Students-Perception-of-Challenges-in-Physics-Learning-and-Relevance-of-Field-Dependency"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/eDxPIdG6Dw.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/eDxPIdG6Dw.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>The study examines high school Students’ Perceptions and challenges in learning Physics regarding Field Dependency. Physics is often represented as being abstract and unrelated to the real-life subject. Field Independent students gain higher than the Field Dependent students as hat independent students’ confidence and understanding are higher than dependent students. The study uses a survey with samples of students drawn from both Urdu and English medium from rural and urban higher secondary schools (N = 500). Firstly, a survey questionnaire for perceptions and challenges in Physics learning and second test for Level of Field Dependency of Johnstone experiment test which is also known as group embedded figure test. Field dependency shows high mean value represents the outcome that mostly students are field dependent. Female students’ ratio is exceeded than male students because of the current pattern of education.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Physics</kwd>
  <kwd>Perceptions</kwd>
  <kwd>challenges</kwd>
  <kwd>Level of Field Dependency</kwd>
  <kwd>Group embedded figure test</kwd>
  <kwd>Hidden Figure Test</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>2185</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>3</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>This study investigates the high school students and challenges in learning Physics regarding Field Dependency. Physics in secondary schools is seen as one of the troublesome occupations (Colletti, 2010). The teachers in secondary schools still are no connection of Physics themes to real-life examples (Ramma et al., 2006). Subsequently, the students, over the entire year, comes in the classroom with a similar kind of procedure, arranging, assets, questions, and assessment methods then it ends up exhausting for the students. In such conditions, students are not just incapable to comprehend and apply science ideas.</p><p>The study ahead with the idea that the Field Independent learner can focus on important things in doing assignments and leave sideways that is unimportant for that task. Similarly, faced with the Physics problem (laws and numerical problems), the Field Independent learner is able to take information in the question that will assist in getting an answer. Thus, this study seeks the impact of being Field Depended/Independent in student Physics learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Review of the Related Literature</title>
<p>The research found that students worldwide are less interested and creative with Physics ideas than other science subjects since progressively dynamic ideas are in physics. Along these lines, the learning of Physics ideas requires more concretization. This investigation additionally looks to investigate a connection between students Physics learning and level of Field Dependency. Witkin and Goodenough (1981), Field Dependency (FD) is represented as an individual: &quot;it&apos;s exceptionally hard to separate the things from its system or foundation. It is likewise hard for individuals who readily acknowledge the administering field or setting effectively. Field free (FID) Individuals can do things independently from a deliberate hypothetical field and its unique situation.</p><p>It is interesting that Erdemir and Bakirci (2009) depicted that physics mentality is the inclination for people who arrange thoughts, feelings, and practices towards the mental article. Individuals are not</p><p>brought into the world with dispositions they adapt a while later. A few frames of mind depend alone understanding, information and aptitudes and some are picked up from different sources. Be that as itmay, the frame of mind does not remain the same. It changes over the span of time and bit by bit. Adensina and Kinbobola (2002) portray understudies/people groups always structure new frames of mind and alter old ones when they are presented to new data and new encounters. Material science subject is estimated as the most risk territory inside the field of science. On the contrary, enrolment, and interest in physics at high schools has been increasing every year that has thoroughly changed the trend towards martial sciences. Students who choose to proceed with their investigations in the field of Physics are additionally frustrated by the high drop-out rates inside the control.</p><p>Witkin and Goodenough (1981) depicted that field-subordinate is an individual that can&apos;t separate a thing from its specific situation. Goodenough (1976) talked about the distinction between field reliance and field freedom as: &quot;The capacity to defeat implanting settings in perceptual working, and it is viewed as the logical part of an enunciated model of field approach as communicated in observation... Interestingly, field reliance alludes to individuals who take the association of the field in perceptual and critical thinking assignments as given, and they experience issues in isolating a thing from its unique situation” (Witkin and Goodenough, 1981). The field?dependence/independence dimension has a huge application to educational problems (Witkin et al, 1974; Goodenough, 1976; Witkin et al, 1977; Witkin and Goodenough, 1981). Therefore, there is a need to explore the field dependency level, learning experiences and perceptions of Physics students of age between14-18.</p><p><break/></p><p>Significance of the Study</p><p>The study seeks details on the conceptual challenges that students usually encounter in secondary school Physics generally, and particularly in Pakistan. I anticipate that this study might help students acquire command over subject knowledge at the secondary level in Physics. There seems to be a huge difference between what is required by students and what happens in the classroom and in the laboratories where students learn Physics. This study may suggest ways to understand the numerical problems of Physics, the common challenges encountered by the majority of students in the secondary Physics class. Also, this study may help in exploring the factors that lead to imperfect Physics knowledge of basic Physics concepts; deep-rooted conceptual mistakes being unaware of the processes and procedures required to perform various numerical problems, laws and practically performed experiments needed to solved and performed in Physics laboratories.</p><p><break/></p><p>Objectives of the Study</p><p>This study involves exploring students’ perceptions, experiences, and the challenges which they face in learning Physics and the probable causes and reasons for the challenges.</p><p>This study has the following objectives:</p><p>1.	To explore the high school students perceptions about Physics learning</p><p>2.	To seek out the high school students perceived challenges in their Physics learning</p><p>3.	To find the Field Dependency correlated with  gender and age of high school students in Physics</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Research Questions (RQs)</title>
<p>This study answer the following questions:</p><p>RQ1. How do high school students think of physics learning?</p><p>RQ2. How do high school students perceive the challenges in Physics?</p><p>RQ3. What is the correlation between Field Dependency on gender and age of students in Physics?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Research Methodology</title>
<p>The research design includes a tool for data
collection. Firstly a questionnaire was used in this study with higher
secondary school students to seek their perceptions and challenges in learning
Physics. Secondly, the Johnston experiment test was used to find the level of
Field Dependency. The questionnaire contained the statements on the students’
perceptions of physics and challenges in learning school Physics. This study
contains the quantitative research method to enlighten why those methods were
applicable and how the research tool like questionnaire was developed and
administered. Also, the tool like Group embedded figure test is known Johnston
experiment test were conducted in schools.</p><p>The
researcher developed a questionnaire in the light of current themes from the
literature such as Physics school learning their perceptions and challenges
students&apos; faces. The measurement of the extent/level of Field Dependency was
measured by Witkin <italic>et al.</italic> also known
as the Group Embedded Figures Test. The tools of data collection are
questionnaire and the Johnstone experiment is administered in this study.</p><p>The goal of
this study is to explore the students’ perceptions towards Physics learning in
the classes the 9<sup>th</sup>-12<sup>th</sup>from the ages between (14-18)
years from both public and private area schools. This includes learners’
reflection of their perceptions, challenges and the nature of the problems
which the students face and the expected cause of these problems. The sample consists of 500 male and female students from public and
private schools. The schools are selected from the public and private sectors
from each of the districts. The schools are selected on an equal basis from the
rural and urban areas.</p><p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Sample
Selected from Schools</p> <table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Number of Schools </bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>No. of Boys schools</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>No. of Girls schools</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Total No of Schools</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Public
  high schools</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td><td> <p>40</p> </td><td> <p>91</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Private
  high schools</p> </td><td> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>22</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>63</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>113</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p><bold>Findings of
the Study                          </bold></p><p>A sample of 500 male and female students from
public and private schools took part in this study. The demographic make-up of
the sample is précised/summarized in the table.</p><p><bold>Table 2. </bold>Demographic
Make-up of sample (N=500)</p> <table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Age</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Gender</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>School
  locality</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>School
  type</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Which
  class</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Parent
  status</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Years</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Are you</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Locality</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td><td> <p>School</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Class</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td><td> <p>status</p> </td><td> <p><bold>%</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>14</bold></p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>Male</p> </td><td> <p>48</p> </td><td> <p>Rural</p> </td><td> <p>46</p> </td><td> <p>Public</p> </td><td> <p>48</p> </td><td> <p><bold>9<sup>th</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>Poor</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>15</bold></p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td><td> <p>Female</p> </td><td> <p>52</p> </td><td> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>54</p> </td><td> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>52</p> </td><td> <p><bold>10<sup>th</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td><td> <p>middle</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>16</bold></p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p><bold>11<sup>th</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>Rich</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>17</bold></p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p><bold>12<sup>th</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p>The above table 1 displays that female students
from the private higher secondary schools belong to the urban areas are quite
higher than the male students because of the patterns in science and education.
Mostly, the students fell into the youngest age group of fifteenth which is
higher in number than the other ages from 14<sup>th</sup> to 18<sup>th</sup>.
The majority, of higher secondary 10<sup>th</sup> class and 12<sup>th</sup>
class students, participated equally and the ratio is slightly higher than the
9<sup>th</sup> class and 11<sup>th</sup> class students. The majority, of the
student, belongs to mediocre families of society with lesser earnings because
their parent income is moderate and judicious.</p><p><bold>Data from the Questionnaires Items</bold></p><p>The questionnaire is divided into four sections in
the Likert form to gain the overall opinions of the respondents. The overall
scenario is presented section by section:</p><p><bold>Section 1. </bold>Think of your school Physics classes</p> <table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>No</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Statements</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly</bold></p> <p><bold>agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Neutral</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td> <p><bold><italic>N=500</italic></bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>I understand my Physics lesson
  completely</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>39</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>57</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>I like the way my teachers
  presents the topics in Physics</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>24</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>66</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>I understand the procedures in
  the Physics class</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>23</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>49</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>24</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>I like doing practical work and
  experiments in the Physics laboratory</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>61</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>20</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>11</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>I dislike home task because I
  cannot do it on my own</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>45</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>20</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>9</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>13</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>13</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>I think tuition is necessary to
  get good marks in Physics</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>25</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>23</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>23</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>19</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>I feel anxiety near the Physics
  examination</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>27</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>32</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>16</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>20</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>5</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>I find I have sufficient time
  of revision at school before examinations</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>18</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>65</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>12</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>I find that it’s difficult to
  revise the year’s syllabus for the final exams</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>21</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>28</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>25</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>18</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>8</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>I do not like short questions because
  I cannot express all that I know</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>32</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>21</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>6</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>26</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>I like multiple choice
  questions in Physics exams</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>43</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>32</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>8</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>12</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>5</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>I think permitted time limit is
  very short in Physics paper</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>21</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>19</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>46</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>13</p> </td><td> <p>If I face difficulty in
  understanding, I seek out help from my teachers.</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>30</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>60</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>5</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>14</p> </td><td> <p>Teachers questioning in the
  classroom helps me to understand</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>22</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>67</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p>From the above table, it is evident that the majority of participant
students easily understand Physics lessons. The majority, of the students,
responded higher that they entirely comprehend the Physics lessons as they
think that their teachers present the Physics topics in a quite better way as
they like the skills and techniques of presenting the topics in Physics class.
Mostly, the student like working in the Physics laboratory because they like
the practical and experimental manual work. In a large number, students dislike
the home task as they cannot do it by themselves. Thus, the majority of
students think that tuition is compulsory to get good marks in Physics subject.
The majority, of students, agreed that they have sufficient time for revision
in school but they feel hard to revise the yearly syllabus that&apos;s why they feel
nervousness close to the Physics examination. Thus, the majority of student
participants liked the multiple-choice questions as they think that they are
easy to respond as they are not time tanked. However, the above data in the
table shows that most students consider they feel difficulty they consult with
their teacher to seek out help and the majority think that teacher questioning
benefits them to simply understand the Physics lectures.</p><p><bold>Section 2. </bold>Think of Physics as a subject</p> <table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>No</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Statements</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly</bold></p> <p><bold>agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Neutral</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td> <p><bold><italic>N=500</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>I like Physics</p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td> <p>59</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>I find Physics useful in my daily life</p> </td><td> <p>35</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>I want to learn Physics because I enjoy it</p> </td><td> <p>30</p> </td><td> <p>47</p> </td><td> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>I find Physics as a boring subject</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>30</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>35</p> </td><td> <p>14</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>I feel Physics easy to remember</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>59</p> </td><td> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>Knowing Physics will help me in my career</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>63</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>I think Physics is the most difficult subject</p> </td><td> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>18</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>37</p> </td><td> <p>19</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>Understanding Physics is very much important to
  me</p> </td><td> <p>44</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>Physics allows me to generate new concepts and
  ideas</p> </td><td> <p>62</p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>9</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p>From the responses of students, the directly above table shows that the
majority of male and female students agreed that they like Physics as a
subject. They want to study Physics and enjoyed it as they think that Physics
is helpful in their daily life. It is evident from the responses of the above
table that the majority of school students disagreed that Physics is a boring
subject as they consider Physics an interesting as well as thought-provoking
and easy to recall subject. Thus, the majority of students expressed that
Physics is a demanding and challenging subject and will help in their career
buildings. However, a large number of students consider that Physics is too
much important and valuable subject because the study of Physics allows
students to generate new ideas, concepts, and philosophies.</p><p><bold>Section 3. </bold>Think of the topics you have studied in
Physics for the 9<sup>th</sup> class - 10<sup>th</sup>classes<bold>Easy         </bold>I understand the topic at the initial stage</p><p><bold>Moderate</bold>I did not
understand it the first time, but now I understand it now</p><p><bold>Difficult.</bold>I still do
not understand the topic</p> <table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><title>Table 5</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>No</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Statements</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Easy</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Moderate</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Difficult</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Not Studied</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">  </td><td> <p><bold><italic>N=500</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold><italic>%</italic></bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>Introduction to Physics</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td><td> <p>47</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>Physical Quantities and
  Measurement</p> </td><td> <p>44</p> </td><td> <p>32</p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>Kinematics</p> </td><td> <p>76</p> </td><td> <p>22</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>Dynamics</p> </td><td> <p>63</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>Turning effect of Force</p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td> <p>70</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>Gravitation</p> </td><td> <p>56</p> </td><td> <p>39</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>Work and Energy</p> </td><td> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>Properties of Matter</p> </td><td> <p>72</p> </td><td> <p>21</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>Thermal properties of matter</p> </td><td> <p>56</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> </td><td> <p>13</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>Transfer of Heat</p> </td><td> <p>43</p> </td><td> <p>54</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>Simple Harmonic Motion and
  Waves</p> </td><td> <p>57</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>Sound</p> </td><td> <p>54</p> </td><td> <p>21</p> </td><td> <p>0</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>13</p> </td><td> <p>Geometrical Optics</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>57</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>14</p> </td><td> <p>Electrostatics</p> </td><td> <p>14</p> </td><td> <p>57</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>Current Electricity</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>42</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>Electromagnetism</p> </td><td> <p>29</p> </td><td> <p>44</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>17</p> </td><td> <p>Introductory Electronics</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>48</p> </td><td> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>30</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>18</p> </td><td> <p>Information and Communication
  Technology</p> </td><td> <p>61</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p>On the whole, the above table displays that it is
not probable to interpret the students&apos; responses in an absolute manner. It is
not easy for any student to consider a topic as difficult and tough. It is
quite evident from the majority of student responses that they take all Physics
chapters and topics easily and modestly. Some of the responses show they
somehow consider the Physics topics difficult as they are in a very small
number. However, the majority take their topics easy as some chapters like Kinematics,
work and energy are considers the easiest topics.</p><p><bold>Section 4. </bold>Think of the topics you have studied in
Physics for the 11<sup>th</sup>class – 12<sup>th</sup>class</p><p><bold>Easy.</bold>        I understand the topic at the initial
stage</p><p><bold>Moderate</bold>. I did not understand it the first time, but now I understand it now</p><p><bold>Difficult.</bold>I still do
not understand the topic</p> <table-wrap id="table6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><title>Table 6</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>No</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Statements</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Easy</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Moderate</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Difficult</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Not Taught</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td> <p>N=500</p> </td><td> <p>%</p> </td><td> <p>%</p> </td><td> <p>%</p> </td><td> <p>%</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>Electromagnetic Induction</p> </td><td> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>17</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>Alternating Current</p> </td><td> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>21</p> </td><td> <p>19</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>Physics of Solids</p> </td><td> <p>17</p> </td><td> <p>29</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>51</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>Electronics</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>69</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>Dawn of Modern Physics</p> </td><td> <p>22</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>73</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>Atomic Spectra</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>73</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>Nuclear Physics</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>73</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p>On the whole, from the responses of the above
table, it is evident that the percentages show that the majority of students
consider the topics in Physics are easy and moderate. They think that topics
are not difficult they only demand more attention and devotion. However,
alternating current is taking as a most difficult topic.</p><p>The results showed that there is a significant
correlation value (r= .22, p &lt; 0.05) was found between age and Field
Dependency score. This value shows that there is a positive but low correlation
between age and Field Dependency from the participants. For the results for the
measured Field, Dependency was correlated with age, a significant and positive
correlation was run. The correlation value obtained was; positive and
significant.  In another study, there was
a marked development of independency with age 12-16 (Onwumere and Reid, 2014).
Indeed, there is considerable circumstantial evidence that the extent of field
independence can grow with age but this seems to depend on experiences and this
has cultural implications (Witkin <italic>et al.,</italic> 1977; Gurley, 1984).  The outcome here may well reflect the fact
that there are limited opportunities to develop increased field independence in
the educational culture in Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Discussions</title>
<p>This research study was envisioned to explore the students&apos; perceptions of Physics learning and their challenges. Initially, the first research question queried about the students&apos; understandings and their perceptions towards Physics learning. This is the trending pattern of Pakistani education, particularly in the public area schools. Mostly, the students belong to the lower or middle class of the society, with lower incomes generally in the Public school of Pakistan. They have to teach and learn with old traditional methods like the lecture method and with limited resources as they do not have enough modern facilities.</p><p>This research study shows that the majority of male and female participants show a positive perception regarding Physics learning. The majority of the students&apos; participants expressed positive views regarding the subject of Physics; with most expressing that they understand and like Physics and they feel happy to study Physics. The students well perceived their book learning and knowledge in Physics. The students commonly find Physics a boring, difficult and uninteresting course and this finding is little conflicting to (Osborne et al., 2000; Angell et al., 2004). Moreover, the results show that Physics is understandable subject as Physics learning was able to provide guidance and further helped them in their future career opportunities which are not consistent with the previous finding of different research studies held world widely (Lavonen et al., 2007).</p><p>The study described that the students&apos; level of satisfaction is enormously high towards Physics learning in the classrooms. In every question, this is by the results of many items. Students show more interest and positive perceptions towards the liking and understanding of Physics. Students like to learn with their interests. The majority of the students stated that teachers should be trained in planning, designing, organizing the curriculum, with the modern use of assessment methods and with the use of information technology as well in Physics is consistent with the ideas of (Ornek et al., 2008). However, Physics teacher pedagogical expertise is most important in the teaching of Physics.</p><p>Onwumere (2009) using the correlation examined the relationships between the performance and extent of the level of field dependency in sciences like Physics and other science subjects. Onwumere (2009) showed the extent of the level of field dependency which was highly correlated with Physics performance relatively for every single age group. The Physics test data were obtained from 500 male and female students. For the reason, that approximately the data was normally distributed, therefore, Pearson correlation was used. The overall correlation values between Physics marks (standardized) and the extent of the level of field dependence is moderate. These results outcomes were consistent with the results of (Al-Enezi, 2006) and (Onwumere, 2009). However, the standardized Physics examination scores reveal several kinds of general abilities in Physics learning’s, and then this general ability correlates with the extent of the level of field dependency measured.</p><p>This study found that females are greater in number than male students and show more willingness towards Physics.  The results from the data analysis also represent that the majority of male participants were highly agreed that they like Physics and take more interest in the aspects of Physics subject than the female participants. The male students are more motivated towards Physics than the female students. This finding is similar to (Angell et al., 2008). This is because male students have more career opportunities in the field of Physics than female students.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
<p><break/></p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7">
  <title>Recommendations</title>
<p>This study recommended the following to the students the teachers, and the Physics curriculum developers as</p><p>•	Physics should be conceptually taught to the students through modern teaching methods than the traditional methods especially before teaching formulas, numerical problems, Physics equations</p><p>•	Various teaching methods should be used to make students more field independent.</p><p>•	Importance should be given to developing the students&apos; knowledge, conceptual thinking, and understanding in the students rather than memorized learning.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/eDxPIdG6Dw.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Adesina">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Adesina, A.O., &amp; A.O. Akinbobola</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <source>The perceptions of students towards part-time</source>
    <page-range>erceptions</page-range>
    Adesina, A.O., &amp; A.O. Akinbobola, (2005). The perceptions of students towards part-time
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ahmed">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ahmed, M</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>, Factors Affecting Initial Teacher Education in Pakistan: Historical Analysis of Policy Network</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, and Field-Independent cognitive styles and their educational Implications. Review of Educational Research</source>
    <page-range>akistan</page-range>
    Ahmed, M. (2012), Factors Affecting Initial Teacher Education in Pakistan: Historical Analysis of Policy Network. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, and Field-Independent cognitive styles and their educational Implications. Review of Educational Research 47(1), (1-64).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Angell">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ã˜, Henriksen, E. K. &amp; Isnes, A</person-group>
    <year>2004</year>
    <article-title>. Physics: Frightful, but Bahar and Hansell (2000)</article-title>
    <source>The Relationship between Some Psychological Factors and changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education</source>
    <page-range>hysics</page-range>
    Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ã˜, Henriksen, E. K. &amp; Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but Bahar and Hansell (2000). The Relationship between Some Psychological Factors and changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), (557-70).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Colletti">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Colletti, L</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>on dragons and turkeys: Physics for future citizens</article-title>
    <source>School Science</source>
    <page-range>hysics</page-range>
    Colletti, L. (2010) on dragons and turkeys: Physics for future citizens. School Science
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Cyparsade">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Cyparsade, M., Moheeput, K., Carooppunnen, S</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <source>Roleplay as an innovative</source>
    Cyparsade, M., Moheeput, K., Carooppunnen, S. (2009) Roleplay as an innovative
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Danili">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Danili E and Reid N</person-group>
    <year>2004</year>
    <source>some strategies to improve performance in school</source>
    <page-range>erformance</page-range>
    Danili E and Reid N., (2004), some strategies to improve performance in school
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Dawson">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Dawson, C</person-group>
    <year>2000</year>
    <article-title>. Upper primary boys&apos; and girls&apos; interests in science: Have they degree Program of faculty of education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Research of Education</source>
    <page-range>rimary</page-range>
    Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys&apos; and girls&apos; interests in science: Have they degree Program of faculty of education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. Journal of Research of Education, 2(1): (1- 4).dependence and field independence (Psychological Issues, Monograph 51). New York: International Universities Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ElBanna">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">El-Banna, H</person-group>
    <year>1987</year>
    <source>The development of a predictive theory of science education based</source>
    <page-range>redictive</page-range>
    El-Banna, H. (1987). The development of a predictive theory of science education based
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Erdemir">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Erdemir, N. and H. Bakirci</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. The change and development of an prceptions of science factor in learning and memory</article-title>
    <source>Psychological Bulletin</source>
    <page-range>rceptions</page-range>
    Erdemir, N. and H. Bakirci, (2009). The change and development of an prceptions of science factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, (675-694).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Flanagan">
  <label>10</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Flanagan, R., Kellaghan, T. and Morgan, M</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. A Study of Non-Completion in fun, Pupils&apos; and teachers&apos; views of physics and physics teaching (Electronic version)</article-title>
    <source>Science Education, (88), (683-706)</source>
    <page-range>upils</page-range>
    Flanagan, R., Kellaghan, T. and Morgan, M. (2001). A Study of Non-Completion in fun, Pupils&apos; and teachers&apos; views of physics and physics teaching (Electronic version). Science Education, (88), (683-706).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Goodenough">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Goodenough, D.R</person-group>
    <year>1976</year>
    <source>The role of individual differences in field dependence as a</source>
    Goodenough, D.R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Gurley">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gurley, M.P</person-group>
    <year>1984</year>
    <article-title>. Characteristics of motivation, field independence, personality type, interaction in upper secondary physics classrooms in Finland and Norway: A survey of students&apos; expectations</article-title>
    <source>Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research</source>
    <page-range>ersonality</page-range>
    Gurley, M.P. (1984). Characteristics of motivation, field independence, personality type, interaction in upper secondary physics classrooms in Finland and Norway: A survey of students&apos; expectations. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), (81-101).International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), (1261-83).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Johnstone">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Johnstone, A. H., &amp; El-Banna, H</person-group>
    <year>1986</year>
    <source>Capacity, Demands, and Processes - A</source>
    <page-range>rocesses</page-range>
    Johnstone, A. H., &amp; El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacity, Demands, and Processes - A
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Lavonen">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Lavonen, J., Angell, C., Bymen, R., Henriksen, E., and Koponen, I</person-group>
    <year>2007</year>
    <source>Social</source>
    Lavonen, J., Angell, C., Bymen, R., Henriksen, E., and Koponen, I. (2007). Social
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Lawrenz">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Lawrenz, F. Wood, B.N., Kirchhoff, A., Kim, N.K</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>Variables affecting physics learning style, and teaching preference of the adult learner as compared with traditional-age college students</article-title>
    <source>(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America), Dissertation Abstracts International, (45, 1268)</source>
    <page-range>hysics</page-range>
    Lawrenz, F. Wood, B.N., Kirchhoff, A., Kim, N.K. (2009) Variables affecting physics learning style, and teaching preference of the adult learner as compared with traditional-age college students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America), Dissertation Abstracts International, (45, 1268).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Murphy">
  <label>17</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Murphy, P., and Whitelegg, E</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    Murphy, P., and Whitelegg, E. (2006).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Osborne">
  <label>18</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Osborne, J., Simon, S., and Collins, S</person-group>
    <year>2003</year>
    <source>Prceptionss towards science: a review of the</source>
    <page-range>rceptionss</page-range>
    Osborne, J., Simon, S., and Collins, S. (2003). Prceptionss towards science: a review of the
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Owen">
  <label>19</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Owen, S., Dickson, D., Stanisstreet, M., and Boyes, E</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Teaching physics: Predictive Model For Science Education</article-title>
    <source>Educational in Chemistry</source>
    <page-range>hysics</page-range>
    Owen, S., Dickson, D., Stanisstreet, M., and Boyes, E. (2008). Teaching physics: Predictive Model For Science Education. Educational in Chemistry 23: (80-84).Psychological differentiation. Studies of development. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ramma">
  <label>20</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ramma, Y., Dindyal, J., Tan, K.C. and Cypersade, M</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>Engaging students to research on the participation of girls in Physics</article-title>
    <source>Institute of Physics Report</source>
    <page-range>articipation</page-range>
    Ramma, Y., Dindyal, J., Tan, K.C. and Cypersade, M. (2006) Engaging students to research on the participation of girls in Physics. Institute of Physics Report.
    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.iop.org/education/teacher/support/girls_Physics/review/file41599.pdf">http://www.iop.org/education/teacher/support/girls_Physics/review/file41599.pdf</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sharma">
  <label>21</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sharma, R.C</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. Modern science teaching</article-title>
    <source>New Delhi: Dhanpat Rai</source>
    Sharma, R.C. (2006). Modern science teaching. New Delhi: Dhanpat Rai.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Stokking">
  <label>22</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Stokking, K</person-group>
    <year>2000</year>
    <source>Predicting the choice of physics in secondary education</source>
    <page-range>redicting</page-range>
    Stokking, K. (2000). Predicting the choice of physics in secondary education.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="strategy">
  <label>23</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">strategy to Actively engage students in learning physics. Proceedings of the International Science Education Conference</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <source>Singapore</source>
    <page-range>hysics</page-range>
    strategy to Actively engage students in learning physics. Proceedings of the International Science Education Conference (2009), Singapore.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Student">
  <label>24</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <source>Student Retention: Using International Policy and Practice, Amsterdam, November (5-7)</source>
    <page-range>olicy</page-range>
    Student Retention: Using International Policy and Practice, Amsterdam, November (5-7).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Students">
  <label>25</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <article-title>Students&apos; perceptions towards different learning activities</article-title>
    <source>Research in Science &amp; Technological Education</source>
    <page-range>erceptions</page-range>
    Students&apos; perceptions towards different learning activities. Research in Science &amp; Technological Education, 26(2), (113-128).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Tinto">
  <label>26</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Tinto, V</person-group>
    <year>2003</year>
    <article-title>&apos;Promoting Student Retention through Classroom Practice&apos;, Enhancing Undergraduate University Courses, 1st ed., Dublin: The Higher Education Authority.upon Information processing theory</article-title>
    <source>Ph.D. Thesis, Glasgow, University of Glasgow. upright in the absence of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology</source>
    <page-range>romoting</page-range>
    Tinto, V. (2003) &apos;Promoting Student Retention through Classroom Practice&apos;, Enhancing Undergraduate University Courses, 1st ed., Dublin: The Higher Education Authority.upon Information processing theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Glasgow, University of Glasgow. upright in the absence of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, (603-614).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Witkin">
  <label>27</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Witkin, H. A., &amp;Goodenough, D. R</person-group>
    <year>1981</year>
    <source>Cognitive styles, essence, and origins: Field</source>
    Witkin, H. A., &amp;Goodenough, D. R. (1981).Cognitive styles, essence, and origins: Field
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>