<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">46</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Social Sciences Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gssr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2520-0348</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2616-793X</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">390767</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).38</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">1236</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Effects of Media Exposure on the Political Polarization Patterns of Students in Pakistan</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Bilal</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad Zahid</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Ali</surname>
      <given-names>Arshad</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Ullah</surname>
      <given-names>Sami</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Communication Studies, University of Okara</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Center for Media and Communication Studies, University of Gujrat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Economics, University of Gujrat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Muhammad Zahid Bilal, Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Studies,University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan.. Contact: 0</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>30</day>
  <month>09</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>09</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>16</day>
  <month>02</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>4</volume>
  <issue>3</issue>
  <season>Summer</season>
  <fpage>292</fpage>
  <lpage>298</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>16</day>
      <month>02</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/article/Effects-of-Media-Exposure-on-the-Political-Polarization-Patterns-of-Students-in-Pakistan"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/SicXBAMmYQ.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/SicXBAMmYQ.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>Political polarization remains central to the political behavior scholarship. In this study, political polarization patterns among the youth of Pakistan with reference to selective exposure approaches of media were examined. Survey from 420 students of Pakistan public sector universities was conducted. It was found that selective exposure to media is still strong in Pakistan, however diverse exposure is also being witnessed in Pakistan. Now the people are also diverting towards diverse exposure. Consequently, political polarization among the university students of Pakistan is still strong. Findings imply that media in Pakistan is playing an important role in strengthening the democracy in Pakistan. Furthermore, it is also concluded that media played a key role to determine voters’ choice during Elections-2013 in Pakistan.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Selective exposure</kwd>
  <kwd>diverse exposure</kwd>
  <kwd>political polarization</kwd>
  <kwd>Pakistan elections-2013</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>3396</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>2</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
Pakistan has a very diverse range of political parties, including parties leaned towards religious, conservative and liberal approaches. Among these political parties, two parties have emerged as main political parties in the parliamentary system of Pakistan since 1970. Left wing oriented party Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and right wing leaning party Pakistan Muslim League (PML) have been sharing the power time and again till 2008. It was observed that no other political party could come into power breaking the hegemony of these two political parties. It was general perception that the monopoly of this bipolar system could not be challenged and that there is no space for the third party. However, in elections – 2013, it was witnessed that a third political force was in the making. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) emerged as a strong political party. PTI challenged the status quo and came up on the mainstream political circle of Pakistan. New leadership persuaded people and specifically youth to cast their votes. Record voter turnout was observed during elections-2013 (Gallup, 2013). Politically charged youth seemed much politically aware about democratic values, system and rights. These circumstance and emergence of third political force need to be studied to have the better understanding of changing dynamics of politics in Pakistan.  Thus, this study is an attempt to know the political awareness of a common man as how they become aware of their rights and how this awareness influences polarization patterns among youth.During elections 2013, the media’s role was very important. Before 2002, Pakistani media was controlled and less pluralist. But now there are a diverse and vibrant media. PEMRA has issued licenses to 91 channels, out of which, 84 are functional. Furthermore, there are more than 200 FM radio stations working in Pakistan. More than 3500 cable distributers have brought more freedom of choices to audience (PEMRA, 2014).This diversity of channels has decentralized the flow of information. Youth is able to get the diverse and multiple views and analysis as compared to the past controlled media environment. On the other hand, consumption of diversity may be seen as a factor of taking strong positions regarding political ideology that could push them toward political polarization. In the context of this emerging media environment, present study aims to explore the political awareness and polarization patterns among university students. It also seeks to examine the role of selective and diverse exposure in polarization patterns among university students. Selective Exposure and PolarizationPolarization is the phenomenon active in all political systems. It is known as having an extreme viewpoint about affiliate party. It is beyond moderation and individuals do not have the flexibility to tolerate any else’s perspective. Most of the studies on political polarization were conducted in America as an emerging phenomenon in American politics. A strong polarity has been witnessed there (McCarty, Poole, &amp; Rosenthal, 2006). In this polarized environment, media outlets often report political news from ideological perspectives(Arceneaux, Johnson, &amp; Murphy, 2012; Groseclose &amp; Milyo, 2005). These media ideological biases may lead to polarization among the voters and influence the elections outcome (Bernhardt, Krasa, &amp; Polborn, 2008). In Pakistan, we are also observing the era of partisan media due to the polarization among the individuals of society.Although partisan media framed issues and events of society according to specific political stance, yet partisan individuals evaluate and perceive media content differently (Vallone, Ross, &amp; Lepper, 1985). In this way, audience expose themselves to specific information which reinforces their political beliefs (Garrett et al., 2014). In an experimental study of American scholars Iyengar and Hahn (2009) revealed that republicans and conservatives mostly prefer news stories on Fox News and they tend to keep them away  from NPR and CNN. On the other side, Democrats and liberals give more attention to CNN and NPR, and they tend to avoid Fox News.On the other side, that polarization patterns of individuals may vary according to the nature of political issues. While exploring the dynamics of political polarization, Baldassarri and Bearman (2007) argue that polarization on one issue need not lead to polarization on all issues. Similarly, according to Prior (2013) also argued that it is difficult to say that ordinary Americans are becoming partisan. On contrary, Dilliplane (2014)found that partisan news play a vital role in vote choice rather than simple reinforcement of voting choice.In this study, the role of media is investigated regarding polarization with the relation to “selective exposure theory”. Selective exposure is the phenomenon in which audience expose themselves to a specific type of information which reinforce their beliefs (Sears &amp; Freedman, 1967; Taber &amp; Lodge, 2006). People give more attention to their preferred candidates and they resist information on the issues contradictory to their perception of importance issues. (Iyengar, Hahn, Krosnick, &amp; Walker, 2008). Similarly, Stroud (2008) found that there is a relationship between political ideology and  media exposure on different media types.Fischer and Greitemeyer (2010) stated that during decision making, people often focused on selective information related to their choice and they avoid the contradictory information. Feldman (2011) also found that the opinions which are more in agreement with the predispositions of the audience make them less biased. Therefore, partisan media and selective exposure both contribute in strengthening polarization patterns among partisans.Furthermore, scholars claim that online media has changed the exposure patterns from selective to diverse exposure (Conover et al., 2011; Gruzd, 2013; Valentino, Banks, Hutchings, &amp; Davis, 2009). Messing and Westwood (2012) argued that social media platforms have changed the media consumption patterns of audience, providing them heterogeneous exposure, which are critical in shaping social values instead of partisan affiliation.    Nevertheless, exposure to social media platforms is also creating polarization among the consumers. A blog study shows that people inclined to give more attention to the likeminded political blogs (Lawrence, Sides, and Farrell, 2010). They found blog readers more segmented and actively seeking political content than non-blog readers. Hargittai, Gallo, and Kane (2008) web link analysis also show that famous political bloggers used to link other like-minded bloggers. This Pro- and counter-attitudinal content exposure is influencing observations and orientation towards opposite party (Garrett et al., 2014). Hence, selective and diverse exposure debates are going side by side either its print, electronic or social media.One aspect of selective exposure that people expose themselves to specific information which reinforces their beliefs. In the present study another aspect being investigated is that people also pay attention to the information contrary to their pre-dispositions in line with the findings of Garrett (2019) which says that there is a small empirical evidence to argue that individuals will avoid entire messages that are contrary to their beliefs (Garrett, 2009).  Therefore, it is not necessary that exposure to selective information lead to reinforcement (Meffert &amp; Gschwend, 2012). Campante and Hojman (2013) investigated the link between media and political polarization. They argue that people have moderate views, prefer to watch different ideologies and arguments.From these literature we may conclude that media exposure either its partisan or non-partisan creates a healthy environment for working democracy. It brings pluralism of ideas and political views among the society. This study aims to measure the effect of selective as well as diverse exposure of media content on polarization patterns of university students. Therefore, researcher found support for hypothesizing following statements.H1a: There would be a positive relationship between media exposure and selective exposure of university students of Pakistan.H1b: There would be a positive relationship between media exposure and diverse exposure of university students of Pakistan.H2:  Selective exposure would be a best predictor of political polarization among the university students of Pakistan.
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<p>Cross-sectional
survey design was used as methodological design in this study. Population of
study was the university students of Pakistan. A sample of 420 subjects was
selected through cluster sampling technique. Five clusters of universities were
made on the basis of provinces; Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan,
and Islamabad capital territory. Data was collected from students of:
Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad; University of Gujrat, Punjab; Government
Collage University, Punjab; Punjab University, Punjab; University of Karachi,
Sindh; Behria University, Sindh; Peshawar University, KPK; and University of
Balochistan. Sample distribution presents in table 1.</p><p><bold>Table
1. </bold>Sample
Distribution</p><table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" rowspan="2">  </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Gender</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>Total</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Female</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Male</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>Province</p> </td><td> <p>Punjab</p> </td><td> <p>56</p> </td><td> <p>64</p> </td><td> <p>120</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Sindh</p> </td><td> <p>75</p> </td><td> <p>36</p> </td><td> <p>111</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>KPK</p> </td><td> <p>22</p> </td><td> <p>60</p> </td><td> <p>82</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Baluchistan</p> </td><td> <p>27</p> </td><td> <p>17</p> </td><td> <p>44</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Islamabad</p> </td><td> <p>44</p> </td><td> <p>21</p> </td><td> <p>65</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>224</p> </td><td> <p>198</p> </td><td> <p>422</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><bold>Measures
of Study</bold></p><p><bold>Demographic
Information Sheet</bold></p><p>Respondents
were asked questions about their demographic information, including; gender,
province and institutional affiliation.</p><p><bold>Scale
for Media Exposure</bold></p><p>Media
exposure was operationalized as the people consuming habits of media, including
electronic media, and online media. A 10-item scale was developed to measure
media exposure. Respondents opinion were measured at five-point Likert scale,
ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Items were about; watching
news bulletins, political discussions, political content, talk shows, watching
campaigns of political parties, use of social media for political information,
political discussion and vote casting awareness. Cronbach alpha reliability was
obtained 0.87.</p><p><bold>Scale
for Selective Exposure</bold></p><p>Selective
exposure was operationalized as the respondents’ tendency towards likeminded
media content. It was measure through 5-item scale. Responses were measured at
five-point Likert scale. Ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Items were about; watching favorable information and supporting information
towards specific political party. Cronbach alpha reliability was 0.72.</p><p><bold>Scale
for Diverse Exposure</bold></p><p>Diverse
exposure was operationalized as the respondents’ tendency towards contradictory
media content to specific party. It was measure through 5-item scale. Responses
were measured at five point Likert scale. Ranging from strongly agree to
strongly disagree. Items were about; watching unfavorable information and
exposure towards information against respondent’s specific political party. Cronbach
alpha reliability was obtained 0.73.</p><p><bold>Scale
for Political Polarization</bold></p><p>Polarization
was operationalized as the respondents’ consistent attitude towards specific
political party. It was measured through 15-item scale. Responses were measured
at five point Likert scale. Ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Items were about; strong political association, affiliation, blind following,
family party, rational analysis of party, defending political party, vote
casting to same party, less inclination towards other parties, persuading
others to specific party, and changing political affiliation. Cronbach alpha
reliability was obtained 0.78. For data analysis and results, we used
descriptive and inferential statistics by using SPSS version 20.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Findings and Discussion</title>
<p>The
present study found that educated youth of Pakistan has become very democratic
oriented in their media exposure (Table 2). Youth of Pakistan does not only
tend towards selective media messages, but also get themselves exposed to
diverse exposure (Table 2). In this way, it is argued that media in Pakistan is
promoting democratic values among university students. It is playing crucial
role in strengthening democracy in Pakistan. Hence H1a and H1b are supported.
It implies that Pakistani media has become pluralistic and it is promoting the
political messages of all the political parties in an effective way. People are
getting not only the like-minded messages but also the messages of the other
political parties.</p><p><bold>Table
2. </bold>Descriptive
Statistics of Scales</p><table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top">  </td><td> <p><bold>N</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Range</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Min.</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Max.</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>SD</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Media Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>422</p> </td><td> <p>40</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>34.17</p> </td><td> <p>7.66</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Political Polarization Scale</p> </td><td> <p>422</p> </td><td> <p>49</p> </td><td> <p>21</p> </td><td> <p>70</p> </td><td> <p>42.22</p> </td><td> <p>8.75</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Selective Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>422</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>15.58</p> </td><td> <p>4.06</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Diverse Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>422</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>16.13</p> </td><td> <p>3.87</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Further this study highlights
that selective as well as diverse exposure are high among university students
and they have become more polarized (Table 2). Political polarization among
university students correlates with selective exposure and diverse exposure
(Model 1). Therefore, regression analysis was executed to further validate the
best predictor of political polarization in university students. Results
indicate selective exposure as the best predictor of polarization, and diverse
exposure as the second predictor of polarization (Table 3, Model 1). In this
way, it is argued that media exposure in Pakistan has become selective and
partisan based. This selective mechanism is influencing polarization patterns
among youth. As it has been previously argued that selective exposure promotes
political polarization (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_1">Arceneaux et al., 2012</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_8">Fischer &amp; Greitemeyer, 2010</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_9">Garrett, 2009</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_15">Iyengar et al., 2008</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_18">Messing &amp; Westwood, 2012</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_20">Sears &amp; Freedman, 1967</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_21">Stroud, 2008</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_23">Valentino et al., 2009</ext-link>). Hence, H2 is supported that
selective exposure of media is the best predictor of political polarization of
Pakistani youth.</p><p><bold>Table
3. </bold>Predictor
of Political Polarization among the University students of Pakistan</p><table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"> <p><bold>Model Summary<sup>b</sup></bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>R</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>R Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std.
  Error of the Estimate</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>.532<sup>a</sup></p> </td><td> <p>.283</p> </td><td> <p>.280</p> </td><td> <p>7.429</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" valign="top"> <p>a. Predictors:
  (Constant), Diverse Exposure Scale, Selective Exposure Scale</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" valign="top"> <p>b. Dependent
  Variable: Political Polarization Scale</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p><bold>Model</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3" valign="top"> <p><bold>Unstandardized
  Coefficients</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Standardized
  Coefficients</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2" rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p><bold>95.0%
  Confidence Interval for B</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p><bold>Std.
  Error</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Lower
  Bound</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Upper Bound</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>21.87</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1.74</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top">  </td><td valign="top"> <p>12.6</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.00</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>18.458</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>25.296</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Selective
  Exposure Scale</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.97</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.100</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.453</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>9.7</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.00</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.777</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1.170</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Diverse Exposure
  Scale</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.32</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.105</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.142</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>3.0</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.00</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.114</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>.527</p> </td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><italic>a. Dependent Variable: Political
Polarization Scale</italic></p><p>However,
findings also claim that media in Pakistan is not only reinforcing existing
attitudes, but also providing opportunities towards diversity of views.
Selective exposure and diverse exposure go side by side as it was found in
previous studies (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_5">Conover
et al., 2011</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_12">Gruzd, 2013</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GSSR/2019/Summer/38%20Effects%20of%20Media%20EDITED_edited_Aiman.docx#_ENREF_23">Valentino et al., 2009</ext-link>). This is a healthy indicator for working
democracy in Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Model 1</title>
<p>Relationship of Media Exposure, Diverse Exposure, Selective Exposure and Political Polarization among University students</p>
</sec>
<fig id="fig-1"><alt-text>Model1</alt-text><caption><title>Model1</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/SicXBAMmYQ/Figure 1.jpg"/></fig>
<sec id="sec-5">
<p>**
Significant at 0.01 level</p><p>* Significant at 0.05 level</p><p>Furthermore, study found that
significant gender differences exists in media exposure of respondents.
Independent sample t-test indicates that male respondents’ media exposure is
higher than female respondents (Table 4). It shows that women interest in political
news and their media consumption is still relatively low in Pakistan. Policy
makers must strive hard to bring equality in political participation of women.</p><p>In sum we can conclude that youth in
Pakistan is actively seeking political information not only relevant to their
predispositions, but also they are diverting towards diverse views and
opinions. Most of the youth is inclined towards selective messages of media,
which leads them towards strong polarization. On the other hand, youth is also inclined
towards diverse views on media which results in decline of polarization among
them.</p><p><bold>Table 3. </bold>Gender Differences in
Democratic Orientation, Media Exposure, Selective Exposure, Diverse Exposure
and Political Polarization among the University students.</p><table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><title>Table 5</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="top">  </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Levene&apos;s Test for Equality of
  Variances</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>t-test for Equality of Means</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>t</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>Tow Tailed Sig</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p>Media Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>2.230</p> </td><td> <p>.136</p> </td><td> <p>-4.135</p> </td><td> <p>420</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>-4.098</p> </td><td> <p>391.381</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p>Political Polarization Scale</p> </td><td> <p>1.638</p> </td><td> <p>.201</p> </td><td> <p>-.717</p> </td><td> <p>420</p> </td><td> <p>.474</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>-.714</p> </td><td> <p>403.470</p> </td><td> <p>.476</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p>Selective Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>1.891</p> </td><td> <p>.170</p> </td><td> <p>-.937</p> </td><td> <p>420</p> </td><td> <p>.349</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>-.928</p> </td><td> <p>389.417</p> </td><td> <p>.354</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top"> <p>Diverse Exposure Scale</p> </td><td> <p>.586</p> </td><td> <p>.445</p> </td><td> <p>-1.396</p> </td><td> <p>420</p> </td><td> <p>.164</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>-1.398</p> </td><td> <p>416.207</p> </td><td> <p>.163</p> </td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The present study strongly argues that media exposure is bringing awareness in the society of Pakistan. The findings of the study state that diversity of media landscape have changed the prior trends of selective exposure and people go for contradictory arguments which increase their knowledge. There not only is an acceptance of the views which reinforce the public’s beliefs, but counter attacks on political parties are also acceptable. Electronic and social media expose all kinds of investigative reports and it seems attractive. Youth of Pakistan tends to expose themselves to all kinds of news to get diverse knowledge. Education, media and emerging political parties have changed the concept of politics in Pakistan.  In the political system of Pakistan, the trend of right wing and left wing allies have been demolished and a good debate within right and left wing has been started on performance and ideology. The mentality of the youth of Pakistan has been changed. With the presence of sound and moderate public opinion, a healthy democracy emerges.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/SicXBAMmYQ.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Arceneaux">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., &amp; Murphy, C</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure</article-title>
    <source>The Journal of Politics</source>
    <volume>74</volume>
    <issue>01</issue>
    <fpage>174</fpage>
    <lpage>186</lpage>
    Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., &amp; Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74(01), 174-186.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Baldassarri">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Baldassarri, D., &amp; Bearman, P</person-group>
    <year>2007</year>
    <article-title>. Dynamics of political polarization</article-title>
    <source>American sociological review</source>
    <volume>72</volume>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <fpage>784</fpage>
    Baldassarri, D., &amp; Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American sociological review, 72(5), 784- 811.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Bernhardt">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Bernhardt, D., Krasa, S., &amp; Polborn, M</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Public Economics</source>
    <volume>92</volume>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <fpage>1092</fpage>
    <lpage>1104</lpage>
    Bernhardt, D., Krasa, S., &amp; Polborn, M. (2008). Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1092-1104.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Campante">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Campante, F. R., &amp; Hojman, D. A</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Media and polarization: Evidence from the introduction of broadcast TV in the United States</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Public Economics</source>
    <volume>100</volume>
    <fpage>79</fpage>
    <lpage>92</lpage>
    Campante, F. R., &amp; Hojman, D. A. (2013). Media and polarization: Evidence from the introduction of broadcast TV in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 79-92.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Conover">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., GonÃ§alves, B., Menczer, F., &amp; Flammini, A</person-group>
    <year>2011</year>
    <article-title>. Political Polarization on Twitter</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at the ICWSM</source>
    <page-range>olitical</page-range>
    Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., GonÃ§alves, B., Menczer, F., &amp; Flammini, A. (2011). Political Polarization on Twitter. Paper presented at the ICWSM.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Dilliplane">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Dilliplane, S</person-group>
    <year>2014</year>
    <article-title>. Activation, conversion, or reinforcement? The impact of partisan news exposure on vote choice</article-title>
    <source>American Journal of Political Science</source>
    <volume>58</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>79</fpage>
    <lpage>94</lpage>
    Dilliplane, S. (2014). Activation, conversion, or reinforcement? The impact of partisan news exposure on vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 79-94.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Feldman">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Feldman, L</person-group>
    <year>2011</year>
    <article-title>. Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect</article-title>
    <source>Political Behavior</source>
    <volume>33</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>407</fpage>
    <lpage>432</lpage>
    Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407-432.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Fischer">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Fischer, P., &amp; Greitemeyer, T</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. A New Look at Selective-Exposure Effects An Integrative Model</article-title>
    <source>Current Directions in Psychological Science</source>
    <volume>19</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <fpage>384</fpage>
    <lpage>389</lpage>
    Fischer, P., &amp; Greitemeyer, T. (2010). A New Look at Selective-Exposure Effects An Integrative Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 384-389.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Garrett">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Garrett, R. K</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Communication</source>
    <volume>59</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>676</fpage>
    <lpage>699</lpage>
    Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Groseclose">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Groseclose, T., &amp; Milyo, J</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <article-title>. A measure of media bias</article-title>
    <source>The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1191-1237</source>
    Groseclose, T., &amp; Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1191-1237.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Gruzd">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gruzd, A</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Examining Polarization in Political Social Media: A Case of Twitter and the 2011 Canadian Federal Election</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrÃ¨s annuel de l&apos;ACSI</source>
    <page-range>olarization</page-range>
    Gruzd, A. (2013). Examining Polarization in Political Social Media: A Case of Twitter and the 2011 Canadian Federal Election. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrÃ¨s annuel de l&apos;ACSI.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Hargittai">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., &amp; Kane, M</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers</article-title>
    <source>Public Choice</source>
    <page-range>ublic</page-range>
    Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., &amp; Kane, M. (2008). Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134(1-2), 67-86.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Iyengar">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Iyengar, S., &amp; Hahn, K. S</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Communication</source>
    <volume>59</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>19</fpage>
    <lpage>39</lpage>
    Iyengar, S., &amp; Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="McCarty">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., &amp; Rosenthal, H</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches (Vol</article-title>
    <source>5). US: MIT Press</source>
    <page-range>oole</page-range>
    McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., &amp; Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches (Vol. 5). US: MIT Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Meffert">
  <label>17</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Meffert, M. F., &amp; Gschwend, T</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. When Party and Issue Preferences Clash: Selective Exposure and Attitudinal Depolarization</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at the Annual conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix</source>
    <page-range>arty</page-range>
    Meffert, M. F., &amp; Gschwend, T. (2012). When Party and Issue Preferences Clash: Selective Exposure and Attitudinal Depolarization. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Messing">
  <label>18</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Messing, S., &amp; Westwood, S. J</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online</article-title>
    <source>Communication Research</source>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>22</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>22</lpage>
    Messing, S., &amp; Westwood, S. J. (2012). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 1(22), 1-22. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0093650212466406</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406">10.1177/0093650212466406</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Prior">
  <label>19</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Prior, M</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Media and political polarization</article-title>
    <source>Annual Review of Political Science</source>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <fpage>101</fpage>
    <lpage>127</lpage>
    Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sears">
  <label>20</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sears, D. O., &amp; Freedman, J. L</person-group>
    <year>1967</year>
    <article-title>. Selective exposure to information: A critical review</article-title>
    <source>Public Opinion Quarterly</source>
    <volume>31</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>194</fpage>
    <lpage>213</lpage>
    Sears, D. O., &amp; Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194-213.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Stroud">
  <label>21</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Stroud, N. J</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure</article-title>
    <source>Political Behavior</source>
    <volume>30</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>341</fpage>
    <lpage>366</lpage>
    Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341-366.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Taber">
  <label>22</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Taber, C. S., &amp; Lodge, M</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs</article-title>
    <source>American Journal of Political Science</source>
    <volume>50</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>755</fpage>
    <lpage>769</lpage>
    Taber, C. S., &amp; Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Valentino">
  <label>23</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., &amp; Davis, A. K</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. Selective exposure in the Internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility</article-title>
    <source>Political Psychology</source>
    <volume>30</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>591</fpage>
    <lpage>613</lpage>
    Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., &amp; Davis, A. K. (2009). Selective exposure in the Internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology, 30(4), 591-613.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Vallone">
  <label>24</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., &amp; Lepper, M. R</person-group>
    <year>1985</year>
    <article-title>. The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre</article-title>
    <source>Journal of personality and social psychology</source>
    <volume>49</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>577</fpage>
    Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., &amp; Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 577.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>