<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">46</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Social Sciences Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gssr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2520-0348</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2616-793X</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">390862</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).35</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">1331</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Public, Private Schools and Deeni Madaris Students Regarding Respect as Moral Adjustment in Society</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Mati Ullah</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Allahnoor</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad Saqib</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Ph.D Scholar, Institute of Education &amp; Research, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Institute of Education &amp; Research, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Institute of Business Administration, Gomal University, Dear Ismail Khan</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Lecturer</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Mati Ullah Khan, Ph.D Scholar,Institute of Education &amp; Research,Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.. Contact: 0</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>31</day>
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>16</day>
  <month>02</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>5</volume>
  <issue>1</issue>
  <season>Winter</season>
  <fpage>341</fpage>
  <lpage>350</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>16</day>
      <month>02</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/article/Comparison-of-Public,-Private-Schools-and-Deeni-Madaris-Students-Regarding-Respect-as-Moral-Adjustment-in-Society"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/OuVFbGEBBy.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/OuVFbGEBBy.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>Respect means due regard for the rights of others, wishes and feelings on the behalf of their achievements, qualities and abilities. The study was cross-sectional in nature. The population comprised of principals, teachers, parents and students of all Public, Private schools and Deena Madras of Southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The key purpose of the study was to compare Public, Private schools and Deeni Madaris students regarding respect as a moral adjustment in society. The total numbers of (n=1500) respondents including “Principals, Teachers, Parents and Students” were taken as a sample through L.R. Gay Size rule of thumb. Convenient, stratified, simple random and disproportionate sampling techniques were used to gather data from the respondents. A statement regarding respect was developed on the six points following Likert type scale. Data was statistically analyzed through SPSS by using frequency and one-way ANOVA that provide important information for policymakers and the stakeholders. Results and conclusions were drawn. It was concluded that respect.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Respect</kwd>
  <kwd>Comparison</kwd>
  <kwd>Public</kwd>
  <kwd>Private Schools and Deeni Madaris</kwd>
  <kwd>Moral Adjustment</kwd>
  <kwd>Society.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>1297</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>1</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>JEL Classification:</title>
<p>HEC, HEC, HEC</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>Basically, respect means to accept someone by building polite and better relationship with him or her on the behalf of praising character and manner; therefore, a respectful person needs to be very kind, thankful, polite and loving towards others so that society and a man whom he or she give respect accept him with good and worthy words so respect is the most powerful moral and ethical weapon to develop mutual love, peace, fair environment, reduce stress and create atmosphere and environment of cooperation as well as sympathy or empathy in society (O’Grady, 2017). It is the responsibility of heads (Principals), teachers, parents, elders and other community members to teach students the importance and value of respect in society by emphasizing to always follow positivity; forgive others for their mistakes, build patience and confidence in day to day dealing; choose honesty throughout your life while maintaining a positive relationship with others in the community and society. One of the key function of the home, institutions (schools) and educated well-advanced society is to inculcate respectful values in students so that students may practically follow and learn the concept of respect for their parents, teachers, elders, older and other people in the community or society (Goodman, 2019).</p><p>Respectful people are highly appreciated in the society due to their loving and polite attitude, towards others; respectful people are always cooperative and loyal; they are positive-minded and encourage their friends, relatives, neighbors and community members to be respectful and follow the formula of “give respect, take respect” in their lives. Respect is one of the key characteristics of value education which is highly focused and prioritized in advanced and quality well-reputed institutions. Therefore, true leadership qualities like patience listening, showing a positive attitude, moral maturity, sympathy, empathy and kindness are all possible due to the nature of respect (Renger, 2018). According to (Collins, 2017), respectful people always act respectfully and listen to others opinions with high patience without creating any hurdle or disturbance; respectful people are mostly free of stress, depression, frustration, conflicts, enmity, fighting, hatred and war but they always try to create fair and friendly environment everywhere. (Ellemers et al., 2013) revealed that it is highly essential for students to make respect the permanent part of their lives, behavior and attitudes to get success and ensure moral adjustment in society as well for the special feedback of their parents, teachers and elders is also very mandatory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Literature Review</title>
<p>(Corzo &amp; Castañeda, 2017) described that respect plays a significant role in the moral adjustment of students in the society because the qualities like courtesy, trustworthiness, empathy, wisdom, courage, authenticity are all directly related with respect; so respect and all the said qualities are concomitant therefore, students are highly emphasized to make respect permanent part of their lives, body, mind and soul which is essential of proper moral adjustment in society.  (Gregory, 2016) narrated that respectful students never discriminate among others; they do not show disrupt behavior in society. Respectful students are highly more punctual, tolerant and regular. They always appreciate the courtesy and loving nature or attitude towards others while living in society. (Macías &amp; Sánchez, 2015) pointed out that respectful people create a welcoming collaborative environment in their classrooms and they learn from day to day happenings and incidents occurring in society; respectful people discourage hatred, negativity and their consistency power is quite developed. Respectful men are very dutiful and their self-awareness quality is also developed due to which they are morally adjusted in society.</p><p>According to (Martínez-Scott, Monjas-Aguado &amp; Torrego-Egido, 2017), men of respect are all the time thankful, they are fully satisfied in their lives and they are accepted among their friends, relatives, neighbors, community members, peers and teachers.  (MOE, 2010) described that the education system manages such curricular activities for students so that they be able to become polite and get moral and civics values. According to (UGC, 2010), in India too, the courses are modified and focus is given on their adjustment in society and other civics values. (Van-Quaquebeke &amp; Eckloff, 2010) asserted that (Dalton &amp; Crosby, 2010) explained that respectful students mostly show better academic achievement and quality learning performance due to their close association with their teachers; talented teachers appreciate their respectful students and give them fulltime feedback in their academics or learning activities. (Canute &amp; Thompson, 2018) found that respectful students are polite, loving, caring, cooperative and courteous; and they are socially, morally and psychology developed in the society.</p><p>(Munévar-Quintero &amp; Giraldo-Quintero, 2015) revealed that educational institutes are trying its best to initiate a program to promote character building and respect in students, for respect is the prophet quality and one of the important functions of schools and colleges is to inculcate moral values and respect among students to make them good citizens and true patriotic Pakistani.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Objectives of the Study</title>
<p>The key objectives of the study were:</p><p>•	To distinguish students of Public-School regarding respect as a social adjustment in society.</p><p>•	To know students of Private School regarding respect as a social adjustment in society.</p><p>•	To examine Deeni Madaris’ students regarding respect as a social adjustment in society.</p><p>•	To compare Public, Private Schools and Deeni Madaris’ students regarding respect as a social adjustment in the society.</p><p><break/></p><p>Research Questions</p><p>•	Are the students of Public Schools are morally adjusted on the basis of their respected behavior in the society?</p><p>•	Are the students of Private School are morally adjusted due to having respect in their behavior in the society.</p><p>•	Are the students of Deeni Madaris are morally adjusted due to having respectful behavior in the society?</p><p>•	Is there any comparison among Public, Private Schools and Deeni Madaris students regarding respect as a moral adjustment in the society?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Significance of the Study</title>
<p>There are certain significances of the study for others to get proper insights from the results of the study:</p><p>•	The study is significant to improve and strengthen society on behalf of respect.</p><p>•	The study is very important for all students to treat and deal with others politely, lovingly and respectfully by adopting a respectful attitude in society.</p><p>•	The study is very helpful for all students to morally adjust themselves in society.</p><p>•	The study is quite vital for parents, teachers, elders, and other community members to emphasize students for practical implementation and adaptation of respect in their lives and society.</p><p>•	The study is significant for those students who have been deprived of the quality like respect in society.</p><p>•	The study is very significant for the government, education department, parents and teachers to aware students about give respect and take respect tactics to enhance and positively polish society toward prosperity and development.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Research Methodology</title>
<p>The study is cross-sectional in nature. Survey method was adopted for conducting the study. The main aim of the study is to see the adjustability of the students of private, public and Deeni Madaris due to having respect in their behavior. All the principals, teachers, parents and students of public, private and Deeni Madaris constituted the population of the study which is reflected in Table 1 which shows that Public, Private Secondary schools and Deeni Madaris students of Southern districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa including (Bannu, Lakki Marwat, D.I.Khan, Tank, Kohat and Karak) were the populations of the study. The total numbers of respondents including (Principals, Teachers, Parents and Students) according to the constitution (25th amendment) act/KP/Section 6/Chapter-II/Land Govt. of KP Board of Revenue &amp; Estate Department Peshawar/dated:19.07.2018 were (N= 405957) in which Public schools respondents were 148995, Private school respondents were  82784, and Deeni Madaris respondents were 174178 respectively.</p><p>Table 2 denotes that the total numbers of (n=1500) respondents including (Principals, Teachers, Parents and Students) were taken as sample out of the total population (N= 405957) respondents by applying L.R. Gay Sample Size rule of thumb to determine the sample size for the current study for generalization of findings towards the population, for which disproportionate, convenient (judgmental), simple random and stratified sampling techniques were used for taking of a sample from the respondents to generalize the results towards the population of the study and to attain the desired objectives of the research study.</p><p>Data was collected through six points Likert type scale of options Strongly Agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree carrying values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 respectively. The data was delimited only to male respondents (Principals, Teachers, Parents and Secondary school and Deeni Madaris students). The self-explanatory tables of population and sample are as under:</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7">
  <title>L.R.Gay Sample Size Rules of Thumb (Formula)</title>
<table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Population</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Sample Size</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>&lt; 100</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Entire Population</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Population Equal/Approximately Equal to 500</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>50 % (250)</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Population Equal/Approximately Equal to 1500</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>20% (300)</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Population Greater/More than 5000</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>500</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><bold>Table 1. </bold>Target Population of the
Study</p><table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="13"> <p><bold>Categories of Institutions/Schools</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">   <p><bold>Districts</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>Public Schools</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>Private Schools</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>Deeni Madaris</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Kohat</p> </td><td> <p>49</p> </td><td> <p>917</p> </td><td> <p>16537</p> </td><td> <p>14800</p> </td><td> <p>32</p> </td><td> <p>750</p> </td><td> <p>6500</p> </td><td> <p>5010</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>155</p> </td><td> <p>5330</p> </td><td> <p>4200</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Karak</p> </td><td> <p>54</p> </td><td> <p>1007</p> </td><td> <p>13425</p> </td><td> <p>11010</p> </td><td> <p>37</p> </td><td> <p>875</p> </td><td> <p>8010</p> </td><td> <p>6050</p> </td><td> <p>106</p> </td><td> <p>370</p> </td><td> <p>10459</p> </td><td> <p>9010</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Bannu</p> </td><td> <p>58</p> </td><td> <p>1029</p> </td><td> <p>15056</p> </td><td> <p>13000</p> </td><td> <p>40</p> </td><td> <p>800</p> </td><td> <p>10011</p> </td><td> <p>8020</p> </td><td> <p>193</p> </td><td> <p>888</p> </td><td> <p>25742</p> </td><td> <p>24000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Lakki</p> </td><td> <p>57</p> </td><td> <p>923</p> </td><td> <p>14386</p> </td><td> <p>13060</p> </td><td> <p>39</p> </td><td> <p>883</p> </td><td> <p>8300</p> </td><td> <p>7070</p> </td><td> <p>171</p> </td><td> <p>604</p> </td><td> <p>19533</p> </td><td> <p>18180</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>D.I.Khan</p> </td><td> <p>78</p> </td><td> <p>1214</p> </td><td> <p>13785</p> </td><td> <p>11050</p> </td><td> <p>68</p> </td><td> <p>910</p> </td><td> <p>9073</p> </td><td> <p>7035</p> </td><td> <p>171</p> </td><td> <p>526</p> </td><td> <p>21888</p> </td><td> <p>20190</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Tank</p> </td><td> <p>26</p> </td><td> <p>421</p> </td><td> <p>4038</p> </td><td> <p>3015</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>210</p> </td><td> <p>2015</p> </td><td> <p>1030</p> </td><td> <p>61</p> </td><td> <p>159</p> </td><td> <p>6842</p> </td><td> <p>5350</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Sub Total</p> </td><td> <p>322</p> </td><td> <p>5511</p> </td><td> <p>77227</p> </td><td> <p>65935</p> </td><td> <p>232</p> </td><td> <p>4428</p> </td><td> <p>43909</p> </td><td> <p>34215</p> </td><td> <p>752</p> </td><td> <p>2702</p> </td><td> <p>89794</p> </td><td> <p>80930</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Total</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>148995</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>82784</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>174178</bold></p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><bold><italic>Source: </italic></bold><italic>Constitution
(25th amendment) act/KP/Section 6/Chapter-II/Land Govt. of KP Board of Revenue
&amp; Estate Department Peshawar/dated: 19.07. 2018</italic>.</p><table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Sample of the Study</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="13" valign="top"> <p><bold>Categories
  of Institutions/Schools</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">   <p><bold>Districts</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4" valign="top"> <p><bold>Public
  Schools</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4" valign="top"> <p><bold>Private Schools</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4" valign="top"> <p><bold>Deeni Madaris</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Principals</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Students</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Parents</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District Kohat</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District Karak</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District Bannu</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District Lakki Marwat</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>52</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>52</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>52</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District D.I. Khan</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>District Tank</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>50</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Sub Total</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Total</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>500</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>500</bold></p> </td><td colspan="4"> <p><bold>500</bold></p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><bold>Validity of Instrument</bold></p><p>Content and face validity of the instrument was used with the advice
of supervisor and experts for validity. After checking by professionals, the
questions were rearranged and unnecessary questions were omitted.</p><p><bold>Reliability of
Instrument</bold></p><p>The split-half reliability was used to analyze
and assess the internal consistency of the research instrument thereby using
Cronbach’s alpha to determine the internal consistency among the different
measures of the study. The Cronbach’s alpha result was reliable and acceptable
as shown in the table below:</p><table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Reliability Statistics</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Cronbach’s alpha</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>No. of Items</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>0.871</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><bold>Data Collection </bold></p><p>The item was developed for taking the opinion of different stakeholders
i.e. principals, teachers, parents and students regarding the adjustability of
the students in terms of respect in society. The researcher ensured the content
and face validity of the item under the kind supervision of the supervisor and
other professionals; and statement was properly rearranged.</p><p><bold>Delimitations
of the Study</bold></p><p>The study was delimited to male respondents
(Principals, Teachers, Students and Parents) of six districts (Kohat, Karak,
Bannu, Lakki Marwat, D.I.Khan and Tank) in Southern division of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa only.</p><p><bold>Data
Analysis</bold></p><p>Data was entered into SPSS. Frequency and one-way ANOVA were used to
statistically analyze the data. The frequency table provides the variation in
the respondents’ responses regarding respect as moral adjustment of students in
society from various dimensions such as Public, Private schools and Deeni
Madaris.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8">
  <title>Results</title>
<p>Table 3 shows that out of (n=1500) respondents, 60
respondents are Principals, 270 respondents are teachers, 270 respondents are
parents and 900 respondents are students. Overall, 219 respondents provide
Strongly Agreed responses, 682 Agreed responses, 191 Slightly Agreed responses,
158 Slightly Disagreed responses, 136 Disagreed responses and 114 Strongly
Disagreed responses about the statement regarding “Respect”. The above table is
self-explanatory and the decision can be made in
a variation of the responses wherein the majority of the
respondents have shown their agreement with the statement that their students
respect others due to which they can morally adjust in society.</p><table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Respect (Frequency)</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"> <p>Statement</p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>Respondents</bold></p> </td><td colspan="7" valign="top"> <p><bold>Responses of Respondents</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2"> <p><bold>Sub Total</bold></p> </td><td rowspan="2">  <p><bold>Total</bold></p>          <p><bold>Total</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Institutions/</bold></p> <p><bold>Schools</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Slightly Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Slightly Disagree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Strongly disagreed</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="12"> <p>Our students  respect others in society</p> </td><td rowspan="3" valign="top">  <p>Principals</p> </td><td> <p>Public School</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td rowspan="3">  <p>60</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Private School</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>1</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Deeni Madaris</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="top">  <p>Teachers</p> </td><td> <p>Public School</p> </td><td> <p>19</p> </td><td> <p>39</p> </td><td> <p>12</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td rowspan="3">  <p>270</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Private School</p> </td><td> <p>18</p> </td><td> <p>34</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>14</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Deeni Madaris</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>28</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="top">  <p>Parents</p> </td><td> <p>Public School</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>36</p> </td><td> <p>13</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>7</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td><td rowspan="3">  <p>270</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Private School</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>40</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Deeni Madaris</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>32</p> </td><td> <p>11</p> </td><td> <p>10</p> </td><td> <p>8</p> </td><td> <p>6</p> </td><td> <p>90</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="top">  <p>Students</p> </td><td> <p>Public School</p> </td><td> <p>24</p> </td><td> <p>189</p> </td><td> <p>28</p> </td><td> <p>20</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>16</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td><td rowspan="3">  <p>900</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Private School</p> </td><td> <p>23</p> </td><td> <p>133</p> </td><td> <p>36</p> </td><td> <p>34</p> </td><td> <p>36</p> </td><td> <p>38</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Deeni Madaris</p> </td><td> <p>43</p> </td><td> <p>129</p> </td><td> <p>35</p> </td><td> <p>39</p> </td><td> <p>29</p> </td><td> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>300</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" valign="top"> <p>Total</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>219</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>682</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>191</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>158</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>136</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>114</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1500</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>1500</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Table 4 reveals that the Mean value of teachers is
maximum i.e. 35.272 with the significant value (.000) and after that the Mean
value of students i.e. 21.868 with the significant value (.000), then
principals 21.583 with the significant value (.000) and at last parents i.e.
19.380 with significant value (.000). So it is clear from the findings that the
perceptions of teachers regarding their children studied in the public, private schools and Deeni Madaris having a significant
influence in the society. Overall results elaborate that the p-value is less
than 0.05 for all four groups under study which means that there is a significant
group Mean difference in responses of the respondents about the statement
related to the moral adjustment of the students in society. So it is
interpreted that these results are generalizable.</p><p><bold>Table
4. </bold>Respect (ANOVA)</p> <table-wrap id="table6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><title>Table 6</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" valign="top">  </td><td> <p><bold>Sum of Squares</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3"> <p>Principals</p> </td><td> <p>Between Groups</p> </td><td> <p>107.916</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>21.583</p> </td><td> <p>40.164</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Within Groups</p> </td><td> <p>802.828</p> </td><td> <p>1494</p> </td><td> <p>.537</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>910.744</p> </td><td> <p>1499</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">  <p>Teachers</p> </td><td> <p>Between Groups</p> </td><td> <p>176.359</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>35.272</p> </td><td> <p>80.663</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Within Groups</p> </td><td> <p>653.291</p> </td><td> <p>1494</p> </td><td> <p>.437</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>829.650</p> </td><td> <p>1499</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">  <p>Students</p> </td><td> <p>Between Groups</p> </td><td> <p>109.341</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>21.868</p> </td><td> <p>42.121</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Within Groups</p> </td><td> <p>775.642</p> </td><td> <p>1494</p> </td><td> <p>.519</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>884.983</p> </td><td> <p>1499</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">  <p>Parents</p> </td><td> <p>Between Groups</p> </td><td> <p>96.898</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> </td><td> <p>19.380</p> </td><td> <p>44.146</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Within Groups</p> </td><td> <p>655.846</p> </td><td> <p>1494</p> </td><td> <p>.439</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>752.744</p> </td><td> <p>1499</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-9">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<p>According to the previous studies, respect is highly important for students to adopt to morally adjust in society. (Ellemers et al., 2013) found that the key aim of students schooling whether at home or in school is to learn a life routine full of respect and ethics. (Leary &amp; Baumeister, 2000) described that parents and teachers are highly responsible for motivating students toward the concept and practical adaptation of respect throughout their lives. Modern studies also emphasised on students to be the men of respect so that their schooling at homes and schools may be true evidence to learn respect for everybody in society as morally adjusted personality everywhere (Spears, Ellemers, &amp; Doosje, 2005). In this study, the researcher highlighted the fact under discussion in the light of statistical results that teachers are highly serious regarding students’ schooling and motivation toward respect in their practical lives. On behalf of teachers’ keen interest and instigation of students to always adopt the formula “Give respect and take respect”, students’ respectful attitudes develop. In this regard, parents are not found too much serious to motivate their children to respect others in society.</p><p>According to (García-Moya, Moreno &amp; Brooks, 2019), respectful people are highly authentic; they express positive appreciation and views; they are very honest and tactful. Respectful people better know their priorities in their lives. (García-Moya, Brooks &amp; Moreno, 2019) elaborated that it is the responsibility of home and school (institution) to practically develop respect in students so that respectful students may think ahead, inspire others, show good memories, express their strong ideas, opinions and maintain positive as well as attractive interaction with others in society. (?iuladien? &amp; Raudeli?nait?, 2015) found that respectful people usually acknowledge others’ dignity; they always apologize when they are wrong by chance and simply say polite words like sorry, how sad and so on and this attitude indicates their level of respect. (Goldson, 2018) found that respectful people trust their guts and they respectfully shared their assets. Respectful people respect those who are in trouble and difficulties; respectful people are willing to compromise on the behalf of their developed polite nature i.e. respect.</p><p>(Cureton, 2013) described that respectful students are authentic listeners. They listen to their parents, teachers and elders. They never kill their time and they do not tell lie. Respectful students happily accept responsibilities handover to them by their parents, teachers or elders; and they technically handle all matters in the society. (Zinkin, 2017) explained that respectful men are trustworthy and trust on others anywhere they live. Respectful people are highly devoted people and they share their generosity for the well-being of others. Respectful people never gossip but they openly express their ideas and views. They are good and successful decision-makers in society due to which they are morally adjusted in society.  (Ware, 2014) stated that respectful people are better planners to maintain their respect in society. They remember people with their complete names and they avoid contradiction. Respectful students are not stubborn. (Timmons &amp; Johnson, 2015) found that respectful people are fluent and firm; their focus is always on quality not on quantity. (Scholtz, 2015) asserted that respectful people always express their love towards others. (Seglow, 2016) described that respectful people mostly use polite, meaningful words like excuse me, please, sorry, God bless you, thank you and so on which indicates their level and standard of respect towards others in society.</p><p>(Friedman, 2018) found that respectful people are very kind, useful for others; they act respectfully and give high preference to tolerance so that they may easily implement and adopt all the rules, regulations and principles in their lives and society that are directly associated with respect. (Wood, 2010) mentioned that it is mandatory to maintain one’s own integrity; positivity, encouraging others, finding people for doing the right things and holding truth are all the key symbols of respect that are very important for students, teachers, and other community members in the society.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-10">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study explored and further highlighted the main issue of students’ “respect” from various aspects such as Principals, teachers, parents and students hailing from Public, Private and Deeni Madaris. The application of “frequency tabulation and one way ANOVA” provides significant information in deciding and reaching the conclusion; likewise most of the respondents have shown their agreement that the students from all the institutions whether Public, Private and Deeni Madaris are highly respectful regarding their moral adjustment in society that is also validated over the Group Mean differences by using the application of variance that confirmed that there is significant Group Mean difference pertaining respect of the students which support them to morally adjust in society. The key factor behind it is the instigation of parents, principals and teachers towards the students to nurture their respect to adjust them in society to become moral individuals in society. These encouragement and motivation inspire students to focus on their key objectives of attaining their academic and moral status in the institution and society as well.</p><p>In the light of institution wise comparison, the Principals and teachers of Public and Private schools are more interested in motivating students to respect others in society as compared to the Principals (Muhtamim) of Deeni Madaris. Likewise, the ratio of Public and Private school students’ parents is similar or equal regarding motivating students to respect others in society. In the same way, the students of Public and Private schools show more respectful and polite attitudes as compared to the students of Deeni Madaris. The ratio of Deeni Madaris Principals, Teachers, Parents and students is low regarding the statement of students’ respect as a moral adjustment in society.</p><p>To sum up, respect plays a vital role in the social, moral, economic, intellectual, cultural, educational and emotional development of students. Parents, teachers, principals, elders, older and other educationally mature community members are responsible for the students’ motivation towards respect and students have right over them to learn a lot about respect from them in a true sense so that they may able to morally adjust in society.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gssrjournal.com/pdf/gssr/OuVFbGEBBy.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Canute">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Canute, S., &amp; Thompson, C. S</person-group>
    <year>2018</year>
    <article-title>. The construct of &apos;respect&apos; in teacher-student relationships: exploring dimensions of ethics of care and sustainable development</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Leadership Education</source>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>42</fpage>
    <lpage>60</lpage>
    Canute, S., &amp; Thompson, C. S. (2018). The construct of &apos;respect&apos; in teacher-student relationships: exploring dimensions of ethics of care and sustainable development. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(3), 42-60.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref-2">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">ÄŒiuladienÄ—, G., &amp; RaudeliÅ«naitÄ—, R</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <source>Whether relations between students and teachers are constructive at contemporary school? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences</source>
    <page-range>rocedia</page-range>
    ÄŒiuladienÄ—, G., &amp; RaudeliÅ«naitÄ—, R. (2015). Whether relations between students and teachers are constructive at contemporary school? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2855- 2860.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Collins">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Collins, P</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <source>The value of respect: what does it mean for an Army? Journal of Military Ethics</source>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>18</lpage>
    Collins, P. (2017). The value of respect: what does it mean for an Army? Journal of Military Ethics, 16(1), 1-18.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Corzo">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Corzo, Q. J., &amp; CastaÃ±eda, S. Y</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <article-title>. Promoting respect as a human value in a Public School</article-title>
    <source>International Education Studies</source>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <issue>12</issue>
    <fpage>96</fpage>
    <lpage>108</lpage>
    Corzo, Q. J., &amp; CastaÃ±eda, S. Y. (2017). Promoting respect as a human value in a Public School. International Education Studies; 10(12), 96-108.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Cureton">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Cureton, A</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <source>From Self-Respect to Respect for Others, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly</source>
    <page-range>acific</page-range>
    Cureton, A. (2013). From Self-Respect to Respect for Others, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 94, 166- 187.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Dalton">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Dalton, J. C., &amp; Crosby, P. C</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. How we teach character in college: A retrospective on some recent higher education initiatives that promote moral and civic learning</article-title>
    <source>Journal of College &amp; Character</source>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>10</lpage>
    Dalton, J. C., &amp; Crosby, P. C. (2010). How we teach character in college: A retrospective on some recent higher education initiatives that promote moral and civic learning. Journal of College &amp; Character, 11(2), 1-10.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ellemers">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., Stam, D., &amp; Gilder, D</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team</article-title>
    <source>British Journal of Management</source>
    <volume>24</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>21</fpage>
    <lpage>37</lpage>
    Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., Stam, D., &amp; Gilder, D. (2013). Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 21-37.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Friedman">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Friedman, C</person-group>
    <year>2018</year>
    <article-title>. Respect: The relationship between being respected and quality of life of disabled people</article-title>
    <source>Disability Studies Quarterly</source>
    <volume>38</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>3</fpage>
    <lpage>38</lpage>
    Friedman, C. (2018). Respect: The relationship between being respected and quality of life of disabled people. Disability Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 3-38.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Garc">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">GarcÃ­a-Moya, I., Brooks, F., &amp; Moreno, C</person-group>
    <year>2019</year>
    <article-title>. Humanizing and conducive to learning: an adolescent students&apos; â€˜perspective on the central attributes of positive relationships with teachers</article-title>
    <source>European Journal of Psychology of Education</source>
    <page-range>erspective</page-range>
    GarcÃ­a-Moya, I., Brooks, F., &amp; Moreno, C. (2019). Humanizing and conducive to learning: an adolescent students&apos; â€˜perspective on the central attributes of positive relationships with teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 35, 1-20.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Goldson">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Goldson, D</person-group>
    <year>2018</year>
    <source>Showing respect in school: what does it mean? International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives</source>
    <volume>19</volume>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <fpage>586</fpage>
    <lpage>598</lpage>
    Goldson, D. (2018). Showing respect in school: what does it mean? International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 19(5), 586-598.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Goodman">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Goodman, J. F</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. Respect-due and respect-earned: negotiating student-teacher relationships</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Ethics and Education</source>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>3</fpage>
    <lpage>17</lpage>
    Goodman, J. F (2009). Respect-due and respect-earned: negotiating student-teacher relationships. Journal of Ethics and Education, 4(1), 3-17
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Gregory">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., &amp; Gerewitz, G</person-group>
    <year>2016</year>
    <article-title>. The Promise of Restorative Practices to Transform Teacher-Student Relationships and Achieve Equity in School Discipline</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 324-353</source>
    <page-range>romise</page-range>
    Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., &amp; Gerewitz, G. (2016). The Promise of Restorative Practices to Transform Teacher-Student Relationships and Achieve Equity in School Discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 324-353.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Kristie">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Kristie. M. R., &amp; Blake, E. A</person-group>
    <year>2014</year>
    <source>Respect in organizations: feeling valued as &apos;&apos;we&apos;&apos; and &apos;&apos;me&apos;, Journal of Management</source>
    <volume>20</volume>
    <issue>10</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>31</lpage>
    Kristie. M. R., &amp; Blake, E. A. (2014). Respect in organizations: feeling valued as &apos;&apos;we&apos;&apos; and &apos;&apos;me&apos;, Journal of Management, 20(10), 1-31.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Mac">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">MacÃ­as, D. F., &amp; SÃ¡nchez, J. A</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <article-title>. Classroom management: A persistent challenge for pre-service foreign language teachers</article-title>
    <source>Profile Issues in Teachers&apos; Professional Development</source>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>81</fpage>
    <lpage>99</lpage>
    MacÃ­as, D. F., &amp; SÃ¡nchez, J. A. (2015). Classroom management: A persistent challenge for pre-service foreign language teachers. Profile Issues in Teachers&apos; Professional Development, 17(2), 81-99.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Mart">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">MartÃ­nez-Scott, S., Monjas-Aguado, R., &amp; Torrego-Egido, L</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <article-title>. Hunger and prejudice</article-title>
    <source>A study of development education in teachers training. Universidad de Valladolid, Plaza de la Universidad</source>
    <volume>237</volume>
    <fpage>950</fpage>
    <lpage>955</lpage>
    MartÃ­nez-Scott, S., Monjas-Aguado, R., &amp; Torrego-Egido, L. (2017). Hunger and prejudice. A study of development education in teachers training. Universidad de Valladolid, Plaza de la Universidad 1, Segovia, Spain. Proccedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 950-955.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Mun">
  <label>17</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">MunÃ©var-Quintero, C. A., &amp; Giraldo-Quintero, R</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <article-title>. Development and human rights: Incidences, approaches and trends</article-title>
    <source>Legal Magazine</source>
    <volume>12</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>25</fpage>
    <lpage>42</lpage>
    MunÃ©var-Quintero, C. A., &amp; Giraldo-Quintero, R. (2015). Development and human rights: Incidences, approaches and trends. Legal Magazine, 12(1), 25-42.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="OGrady">
  <label>18</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">O&apos;Grady, E</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <article-title>. Learning to be more human: Perspectives of respect by young Irish people in prison</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Prison Education and Reentry</source>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>4</fpage>
    <lpage>16</lpage>
    O&apos;Grady, E. (2017). Learning to be more human: Perspectives of respect by young Irish people in prison. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 4(1), 4-16.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Renger">
  <label>19</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Renger, D</person-group>
    <year>2018</year>
    <article-title>. Believing in one&apos;s equal rights: Self-respect as a predictor of assertiveness</article-title>
    <source>SelfRespect and Assertiveness</source>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>21</lpage>
    Renger, D. (2018). Believing in one&apos;s equal rights: Self-respect as a predictor of assertiveness. SelfRespect and Assertiveness, 17(1), 1-21.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Scholtz">
  <label>20</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Scholtz, S. J</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <source>Engaged Respect, Social Philosophy Today</source>
    <volume>31</volume>
    <fpage>151</fpage>
    <lpage>160</lpage>
    Scholtz, S. J. (2015). Engaged Respect, Social Philosophy Today, 31, 151-160.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Seglow">
  <label>21</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Seglow, J</person-group>
    <year>2016</year>
    <source>Hate Speech, Dignity, and Self-Respect, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice</source>
    <volume>19</volume>
    <fpage>1103</fpage>
    <lpage>1116</lpage>
    Seglow, J. (2016). Hate Speech, Dignity, and Self-Respect, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19, 1103-1116.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Timmons">
  <label>22</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Timmons, M. &amp; Johnson, R</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <article-title>. Reason, value, and respect: Kantian Themes from the Philosophy of Thomas E</article-title>
    <source>Hill, Jr., New York: Oxford University Press</source>
    <page-range>hilosophy</page-range>
    Timmons, M. &amp; Johnson, R. (2015). Reason, value, and respect: Kantian Themes from the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr., New York: Oxford University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="VanQuaquebeke">
  <label>23</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Van-Quaquebeke, N., &amp; Eckloff, T</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. Defining respectful leadership: What it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Business Ethics</source>
    <volume>91</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>343</fpage>
    Van-Quaquebeke, N., &amp; Eckloff, T. (2010). Defining respectful leadership: What it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 343- 358.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ware">
  <label>24</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ware, O</person-group>
    <year>2014</year>
    <source>Forgiveness and respect for persons; American Philosophical Quarterly</source>
    <volume>51</volume>
    <fpage>247</fpage>
    <lpage>260</lpage>
    Ware, O. (2014). Forgiveness and respect for persons; American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 247-260.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Wood">
  <label>25</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Wood, A. W</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. Respect and Recognition, in J</article-title>
    <source>Skorupski (ed.), London: Routledge, the Routledge Companion to Ethics, 562-572</source>
    Wood, A. W. (2010). Respect and Recognition, in J. Skorupski (ed.), London: Routledge, the Routledge Companion to Ethics, 562-572.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Zinkin">
  <label>26</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Zinkin, M</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <source>Kantian Constructivism, Respect, and Moral Depth</source>
    Zinkin, M. (2017). Kantian Constructivism, Respect, and Moral Depth,
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>