ARTICLE

MENTORING FUNCTIONS AND JOB SATISFACTION MODERATING ROLE OF COGNITIVE BASED TRUST

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

33 Pages : 320-328

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).33      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).33      Published : Mar 2021

Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust

Abstract

    This study is to find out an attempt to verify the mentoring role of trust between mentoring function received and work attitude. For this purpose, national and international level NGOs working in multisectorial of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have been selected through stratified sampling techniques. 273 questionnaires were distributed among various employees in selected Districts. Out of which, 246 questionnaires were included for research analysis purposes. The responses of the respondents were measured through a structured questionnaire having a five-point Likert scale. Mentoring function has been found as a dependent variable, while work attitude has been termed as the independent variable. Mentoring function has been further categorized into two subclasses, i.e. career development and psychological support and work attitude have further elaborated into job satisfaction. It can be included that career support and psychological support are significant with job satisfaction, and there is a positive relationship between dependent and independent variables.

    (1) Tahir Hassan
    Ph.D. Scholar, Qurtuba University Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Sajid Rahman Khattak
    Assistant Professor, IBMS, The University of Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Akarak & Ussahawanitchakit. (2008). Mentoring and job satisfaction in Malaysian SMEs. journal of management development, 30(4), 427-440.
  • Akarak, A.G., Quistberg, D.A. & Shea, J.A. (2008). Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania. Results of a faculty survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22 (2), 210-214.
  • Bally. (2007). Mentoring and career development. Career Development International, 10(6/7), 425-428.
  • Boyle, I. J. (1995). The more you can get the better: Mentoring constellations and intrinsic career success. Career development international, 9(6), 578-594
  • Burger, Hancock, K. M., Johnson, A. & Daly, J. (2009). Measuring the job satisfaction of physician in organized settings. Journal of Medical Care, 22(1), 56-68.
  • Burke, R.J. & McKeen. (1990). Mentoring in organizations: Implicationsfor women. Journal of Business Ethics. 9, 317-332.
  • Chao, G.T., Walz, P.M. & Gardner, P.D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorship: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with non-mentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45: 619-636.
  • Conway, & Kuchinke, K. P. (2002). The moderating role of trust in formal mentoring relationships in K orea. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 54(1), 57-78.
  • Davis, (2005). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
  • Dominguez, & Hager, (2013). Mentoring resource book: A guide for faculty, researchers and decision-makers.
  • Doolittle, R.T. Steers, R.M. & Porters, LW (2013). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
  • Dougherty, M.C. & Dreher, (1991).Constellations and careers: Towards understanding the effects of multiple development relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22,223-247.
  • Douglas, J., & Sharma, P. (1997). Impact of mentoring functions on career development: moderating role of mentoring culture and mentoring structure. Global Business Review, 16(4), 700-718.
  • Dreher, G. F. & Ash. (1990). Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 297-308.
  • Emmerik, I. J. H. (2004). The more you can get the better: mentoring constellations and intrinsic career success. Career Development International, 9(6), 578-594.
  • Erdem, Hancock, K.M., Johnson, A., Daly, J. & Jackson, D. (2008). Role stress in nurses: Review of related factors and strategies for moving forward. Nursing & Health Sciences, 7, 57-65.
  • Fagensom. (1989). Mentoring academic women: struggle for advancement and Strategies for change. Research and Practice in Social Sciences.2(1), 1-15
  • Gayle, B. S., & Sullivan, S. E. (2005). Mentoring and career development. Career Development International, 10(6/7), 425- 428.
  • Hansford, B., Ehrich, L. & Tennent, L. (2003), Does mentoring deserveanother look?. In Wiesner and Millett (eds), Human ResourceManagement: Challenges & Future Directions, Wiley, Sydney, 219-28.
  • Hunt, N., Michael. (1983). Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor's career success, personality, and mentoring received. Journal of vocational behavior, 64(1), 24-46.
  • Jacobi, (1999). Formal mentoring as a strategy for human resource development: A review of research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 383-390.
  • Johnson, & Cervero. (2004). Role stress in nurses: Review of related factors and strategies for moving forward. Nursing & Health Sciences, 7, 57-65.
  • Keele, E. A. & Buckner, B. (1987). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: MD.Dunnette. Handbook of Industrial and OrganizationalPsychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp 1297-1349.
  • Koberg, CS, Boss, RW & Goodman, E. (1994). Factors and outcomes associated with mentoring among health-care professional. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 53(1), 58- 72.
  • Koberg, CS, Boss, RW & Goodman, E. (1998). Factors and outcomes associated with mentoring among health-care professional. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 53(1), 58- 72.
  • Kram, K.E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenvier, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Kram, K.E. (1985). The relationship between mentoring and career development of higher education faculty members. College Student Journal, 47(4), 703-711.
  • Kram, K.E. (1996). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenvier, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Kram, K.E. Bragar (1992). 'Phases of the Mentor Relationship'. Academy of Management Journal 26, 608-25.
  • Luna & Fresko, B. (1998). Mentoring of new teachers: Correlates of activities and mentors' attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2497-2500.
  • MacArthur, M. L., Pilato, T. A (1995). A metaanalysis of relations between person- organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of vocational behavior, 63(3), 473- 489.
  • Murphy, E.J. & Noe, R.A. (2000). The mentoring information exchange: when do mentors seek information from protégé's? Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 21, 233-42.
  • Opper, & Lyons. (2004). It is not only mentoring: The combined influences of individuallevel and team -level support on job performance, Career Development International, 13(7), 575-593.
  • Ostroff, & Kozlowski. (1993). The effects of formal mentoring on employee work motivation, organizational commitment and job performance. The Learning Organization, 4(2), 53-60.
  • Pembridge, H.; Baugh, S.G. & Euwema, M.C. (2011). Who wants to be a mentor? Anexamination of attitudinal, instrumental, and social motivational components. Career Development International, 10(4), 310-324.
  • Rhay, Steers, R.M. & Porters, LW (2010). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14, 224-247.
  • Scandura, T.A. & Mezias, J. M. (1992). A needdriven approach toexpatriate adjustment and career development: A multiplementoring perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5), 519- 538
  • Swart, Lo, M. C., & Ramayah, T. (2003). Mentoring and job satisfaction in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of management development, 30(4), 427-440.
  • Viator. (1999). Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania. Results of a faculty survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22 (2), 210-214.
  • Young, A.M. (2004). The exchange relationship between mentors and protégés: The developmental of a framework. The Journal ofHuman Resource Management Review, 10(2), 177-209.
  • Zachary, L. J., (2007). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
  • Zey, C.J. (1985). Job satisfaction: Howpeople feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance.New York: Macmillan.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Hassan, T., & Khattak, S. R. (2021). Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(I), 320-328. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).33

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Hassan, Tahir, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2021. "Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I): 320-328 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).33

HARVARD

    HARVARD : HASSAN, T. & KHATTAK, S. R. 2021. Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 320-328.

MHRA

    MHRA : Hassan, Tahir, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2021. "Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 320-328

MLA

    MLA : Hassan, Tahir, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.I (2021): 320-328 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Hassan, Tahir and Khattak, Sajid Rahman (2021), "Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I), 320-328

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Hassan, Tahir, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Mentoring Functions and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Cognitive Based Trust." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. I (2021): 320-328. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).33