ARTICLE

ISSUES OF SYLLABUS DESIGNING PRACTICES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE AT HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL

18 Pages : 135-145

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).18      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).18      Published : Dec 2019

Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level

    The goal of Higher Education Commission is to develop and implement quality across all university activities and making it compatible with international practices. The faculty is required to have ability in designing, maintaining and updating curricula, when measuring the quality of an institute or of teaching; designing syllabus is the basic required skill. This study aims to analyze perception, syllabus designing skills and practices of faculty members in universities. This research is quantitative, structured questionnaire and document analyses were used for data collection. Results showed faculty have no related training; rules for designing syllabus are not followed. It is recommended that training sessions should be organized to developing syllabus designing skills of university faculty. Standard guidelines should be developed by quality assurance bodies.

    (1) Anjum Bano Kazimi
    Professor, Department of Education, IQRA University, Gulshan Campus, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Ali Shaikh
    Vice Chancellor,Media and Communication Studies,Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
    (3) Stephen John
    Director ORIC, Research Innovation, and Commercialization, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Albers, C. (2003). Using the syllabus to document the scholarship of teaching. Teaching Sociology, 60-72.
  • Altman, H. B., & Cashin, W. E. (1992). Writing a Syllabus. IDEA Paper No. 27.
  • Brandenburg, R., & Wilson, J. Z. (Eds.). (2013). Pedagogies for the Future: Leading Quality Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Springer Science & Business Media
  • Bullough Jr, R. V. (2012). Against best practice: Uncertainty, outliers and local studies in Educational Research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 343-357.
  • Diamond, R. M. (1998). Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104- 1310; toll-free.
  • Diamond, R. M., & Grunert, J. (1997). The course syllabus: A learning-centered approach.
  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to Designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gibbons, C., Centi, J., Dezure, A., & Freeman, R. (2006). A Capsaicin Model of Autonomic Nerve Fiber Degeneration and Regeneration. Neurology, 66(5), A258-A259.
  • Habanek D.V. (2005). An examination of the integrity of the syllabus. Col Teach, 53. 62-64.
  • Johnson, G. R. (1995). First Steps to Excellence in College Teaching. Magna Publications, Inc., 2718 Dryden Drive, Madison, WI 53704.
  • Johnson, C. (2006). Best practices in syllabus writing: Contents of a learner-centered syllabus. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 20(2), 139-144.
  • Jones, S. K., Noyd, R. K., & Sagendorf, K. S. (2015). Building a Pathway to Student Learning: A How-To Guide to Course Design. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2060-2069.
  • Parkes, J., Fix, T. K., & Harris, M. B. (2003). What syllabi communicate about assessment in college classrooms. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14(1), 61-83.
  • Rabbini, R. (2002). An introduction to syllabus design and evaluation.
  • Slattery, J. M., & Carlson, J. F. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practices. College Teaching, 53(4), 159-164.
  • Wasley, P. (2008). The syllabus becomes a repository of legalese. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(27), 1-10.

Cite this article

    APA : Kazimi, A. B., Shaikh, M. A., & John, S. (2019). Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(IV), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).18
    CHICAGO : Kazimi, Anjum Bano, Muhammad Ali Shaikh, and Stephen John. 2019. "Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV): 135-145 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).18
    HARVARD : KAZIMI, A. B., SHAIKH, M. A. & JOHN, S. 2019. Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 135-145.
    MHRA : Kazimi, Anjum Bano, Muhammad Ali Shaikh, and Stephen John. 2019. "Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 135-145
    MLA : Kazimi, Anjum Bano, Muhammad Ali Shaikh, and Stephen John. "Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.IV (2019): 135-145 Print.
    OXFORD : Kazimi, Anjum Bano, Shaikh, Muhammad Ali, and John, Stephen (2019), "Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV), 135-145
    TURABIAN : Kazimi, Anjum Bano, Muhammad Ali Shaikh, and Stephen John. "Issues of Syllabus Designing Practices and Quality Assurance at Higher Education Level." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. IV (2019): 135-145. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).18