ARTICLE

NUCLEAR DOCTRINE AND DETERRENCE STABILITY IN SOUTH ASIA

64 Pages : 525 - 530

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).64      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).64      Published : Dec 2019

Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia

    South Asia possesses strategic importance as home to two nuclear-weapon states (NWS) and is also of interest to global powers. The U.S. and the former USSR were interested in expanding their influence in South Asia. After the Cold War, the war against terrorism again drew the attention of the U.S. to conduct military operations in Afghanistan. Pakistan and India received worldwide attention when both developed nuclear capabilities in May 1998 after adopting the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Consequently, the Kashmir dispute emerged as a nuclear flashpoint. In this paper, an investigation is carried out involving the role of nuclear doctrine required to establish deterrence stability in post-nuclearization South Asia.

    (1) Muhammad Tehsin
    Assistant Professor, Department of Defence and Strategic Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Bahadur, K. (2007). “India-Pakistan Relations”, in V.D Chopra ed., India’s Foreign Policy in the 21 st Century, New Delhi, pp. 147-149.
  • Chari, P. (2000). India’s nuclear doctrine: Confused ambitions. The Nonproliferation Review, 7(3), 123–135.
  • Chaudhry, R. R. (2009). India’s Nuclear Doctrine: A Critical Analysis. Strategic Analysis, 33(3), 404-414.
  • Cheema, Z. I. (2010) Indian Nuclear Deterrence: Its evolution, development, and implication for South Asian security. U.K.: Oxford University Press. p. 25.
  • DeFrieze, D. C. (2014). “Defining and Regulating the Weaponisation of Space.” Joint Force Quarterly. 110-115.
  • Feyyaz, M. (2019). “Contextualising the Pulwama Attack in Kashmir- A Perspective from Pakistan”, Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(2), 69-74.
  • Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157–180.
  • Hussain, S. R. (2005). Analysing strategic stability in South Asia with pathways and prescriptions for avoiding nuclear war,” Contemporary South Asia 14(2),142.
  • Javaid, U. & Marium, K. (2013). “The Mumbai Terror 2008 and its impact on the Indo-Pak relations”, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 28(1), 25-37.
  • oshi, Y. & Frank, O. (2018). “New Challenges for Indian Nuclear Doctrine: The Doctrinal Debate, 2003– Present.” In India and Nuclear Asia: Forces, Doctrine, and Dangers, Georgetown. 141-167.
  • Rani, M. (2007). “Nuclear Issue in Indo-Pakistan Relations”, in Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 68(2), 1204-1214.
  • Roe, P. (1999). “The Intrastate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a ‘Tragedy’?” Journal of Peace Research 36(2), pp. 183-202.
  • Sankaram, J. (2014). Pakistan’s Battlefield Nuclear Policy- A Risky Solution to an Exaggerated Threat in International Security, 39(3), 118 – 151.
  • Schelling, T. & Morton, H. (1962). Strategy and Arms Control. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 50.
  • Schweers, P. (2008). India and Pakistan: Trapped in a security paradox. DIAS-Analysis 37. p. 6
  • Singh, A. K. & Vakar, A. (2019). “Pulwama Crisis as seen through Indian and Pakistani Mainstream Media”, Asian Politics and Policy, 11(3), 509-511
  • Sood, R. (2014). Should India Revise its Nuclear Doctrine? Policy Brief No.18, APLN and CNND.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Tehsin, Muhammad. 2019. "Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV): 525 - 530 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).64
    HARVARD : TEHSIN, M. 2019. Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 525 - 530.
    MHRA : Tehsin, Muhammad. 2019. "Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 525 - 530
    MLA : Tehsin, Muhammad. "Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.IV (2019): 525 - 530 Print.
    OXFORD : Tehsin, Muhammad (2019), "Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Stability in South Asia", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV), 525 - 530